English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-08 23:31:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Languages

10 answers

not in my oxford english, there is plurality tho and pluralise

2006-11-08 23:33:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Plurivalent certainly exists. The French are perhaps fonder of it than English speakers. It is used mainly in scientific circles for describing something with a number of different qualities -- eg. the plurivalent beneficial effects of St John's Wort. If there is such a word as plurivalent, then there is no reason why it shouldn't exist in its adverbial form as plurivalently. It's hard to think of a context -- plurivalently beneficial, perhaps.

2006-11-09 08:30:14 · answer #2 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 1 0

What context did it appear in? As a neologism (a new word) if it makes sense from its constituent parts then I suppose it would be acceptable as being constructed from 'pluri' and 'valency'. Also, -valent can be linked up with poly-, as in polyvalent.

2006-11-09 07:38:34 · answer #3 · answered by Chilli 2 · 0 0

I don't think it's a word, I can't find a definition for it.

2006-11-09 07:33:52 · answer #4 · answered by i have no idea 6 · 0 0

Caicos Turkey is right.

2006-11-09 09:32:48 · answer #5 · answered by haggesitze 7 · 0 0

I don't think so, try plurality!!!

2006-11-09 07:35:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd go with multivalently. Multivalent is in my dictionary.

Do I know you?

2006-11-09 08:05:33 · answer #7 · answered by Goddess of Grammar 7 · 0 0

i tink you jus made that word up ya silly moo!

2006-11-09 07:36:53 · answer #8 · answered by DEMON 3 · 0 0

no

2006-11-09 07:50:43 · answer #9 · answered by sunshine 2 · 0 0

NO ITS NOTY

2006-11-09 07:38:55 · answer #10 · answered by MURMAID 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers