not in my oxford english, there is plurality tho and pluralise
2006-11-08 23:33:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plurivalent certainly exists. The French are perhaps fonder of it than English speakers. It is used mainly in scientific circles for describing something with a number of different qualities -- eg. the plurivalent beneficial effects of St John's Wort. If there is such a word as plurivalent, then there is no reason why it shouldn't exist in its adverbial form as plurivalently. It's hard to think of a context -- plurivalently beneficial, perhaps.
2006-11-09 08:30:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doethineb 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What context did it appear in? As a neologism (a new word) if it makes sense from its constituent parts then I suppose it would be acceptable as being constructed from 'pluri' and 'valency'. Also, -valent can be linked up with poly-, as in polyvalent.
2006-11-09 07:38:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chilli 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it's a word, I can't find a definition for it.
2006-11-09 07:33:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by i have no idea 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Caicos Turkey is right.
2006-11-09 09:32:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by haggesitze 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so, try plurality!!!
2006-11-09 07:35:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd go with multivalently. Multivalent is in my dictionary.
Do I know you?
2006-11-09 08:05:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Goddess of Grammar 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i tink you jus made that word up ya silly moo!
2006-11-09 07:36:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by DEMON 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-11-09 07:50:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by sunshine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO ITS NOTY
2006-11-09 07:38:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by MURMAID 1
·
0⤊
0⤋