English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-08 19:16:58 · 12 answers · asked by Sarah n Will A 1 in Environment

volcanoes seem to produce a lot of CO2 and all the energy released is wasted. personally i find nitrogen more useful. pure oxygen seems a little poisonous aswell as explosive.

photosynphasis (excuse my speeling) is there a limit to a plants carbon absorbsion or will it produce more oxygen if say there is more carbon in the atmosphere

2006-11-08 19:42:30 · update #1

btw the green tax is a uk issue at the moment

2006-11-08 19:43:43 · update #2

12 answers

Because she won't pay. Go ahead, try to make her! You have to understand, politicians tax hard working people for the same reason bad guys rob banks; because that is where the money is!

2006-11-09 01:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 0

We can't tax her because she does not exist. The term "Mother Nature" came from people beliving that a female controled the weather with her emotions. The weather is realy controled by the solar system and the earths atmosphere.

2006-11-09 01:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by Arius H 1 · 0 0

How is Mother Nature the biggest culprit? She compensates for anything produced. I`ve never seen her in a 4x4, leaving lights on, or wasting energy. WE`RE the offenders!

2006-11-08 19:31:40 · answer #3 · answered by The BudMiester 6 · 1 0

also the largest consumer of CO2.
who put all the fossil fuels, chalks and limestone, methane etc, out of the way so that the global climate has stayed relativly stable in a zone suitable for life as we know it for millenia.

So yes tax mother nature; but only if we pay her first when we take stuff out that "she" locked away.

2006-11-08 23:56:20 · answer #4 · answered by fred 6 · 0 0

Mother nature, through photosynthesis, is also the largest converter of CO2 to O2. You know, the stuff we find really rather useful.

2006-11-08 19:30:16 · answer #5 · answered by AaronO 2 · 1 0

When did your mother spend hour upon hour at the computer!?. When did she expect someone to empty her bin!?.
When did she ever leave the lights on, or the stand-by switch!?.
When did she use us as unlimited cheap fuel!?.
And when did she abuse the privilege to live in this environmental enclave!?.

2006-11-09 01:35:52 · answer #6 · answered by Old Man of Coniston!. 5 · 0 0

I wouldn't put it past the current government. Give it a few years and the environment will not be fashionable.

2006-11-08 22:14:50 · answer #7 · answered by sensifool 1 · 0 0

thats 2

2006-11-08 19:24:09 · answer #8 · answered by pop 4 · 0 0

why dont we just not buy any american products and then the worse offenders dont produce as much CO2 as they have less money and are not manufacturing as much.
Its easy isnt it!

2006-11-08 19:36:54 · answer #9 · answered by Juan Kassoff 3 · 0 0

We have already taken more than enough from her.

2006-11-08 19:30:26 · answer #10 · answered by keefer 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers