Why aren't gay people satisfied with civil unions that grant them all the rights they complain about?

Answer 1

one should think they would be over joyed

marriage is a religious thing, and if you really want separation of church and state, but out of marriages

Answer 2

actual, civil union would not equivalent marriage. Technically, a marriage with a heterosexual couple is merely a civil union if it grew to become into performed by potential of a magistrate. a marriage, regardless of the shown fact that, isn't merely an equivalent partnership. a marriage ought to have faith. that's why the Catholic Church would not have divorce, yet we do have annulments. A divorce is the destruction of a valid marriage. An annulment potential that the marriage grew to become into no longer valid in the beginning. The argument "separate isn't equivalent" worked nicely during the Civil Rights flow. regardless of the shown fact that, we've been talking approximately race on the time, no longer sexual orientation. Race is a horse of a different coloration, in case you will pardon the stupid comedian tale. whilst it is composed of sexual orientation, regardless of the shown fact that, first of all, that's seen an abomination unto the Lord. 2nd, an option existence form is, by potential of definition, become autonomous from the foremost bypass. third, the civil union does, certainly, supply all an identical criminal rights as what a approaches too many people call "marriage" at present. i'm a heterosexual, and that i'm married, by using fact my dating relies upon faith in God besides as love for my husband, and we've been sure by potential of a member of the clergy. regardless of the shown fact that, if my husband and that i've got been atheists and were married in a civil ceremony, previously a magistrate, i might talk over with my dating as a civil union. it ought to no longer be a valid marriage without that dating with God as area of the union. by using fact homosexuals are sinning and flaunting the regulations of God interior their existence form, then theirs can in no way be a dating based upon faith, and for this reason can in no way be a valid marriage, merely a civil union. regardless of the shown fact that, they experience that by using fact the fool heterosexuals who get under the impression of alcohol in a bar and get hitched in Las Vegas while not having pronounced lots as 2 words to one yet another formerly can call what they ahve a marriage, then they desire to have the potential to call theirs a marriage, besides, and thanks to this they are actually not content fabric.

Answer 3

Because civil unions doesn't grant the same rights as a traditional marriage. Gays are looking for marriage rights so then they could use medical coverage from their partner's job.

Its a matter of trying to get better medical coverage that they would normally be turned down because they are part of high-risk group who catches AIDS. Gays are looking for free rides on medical coverages - and so the reason why medical coverage keeps rising.

Answer 4

Because civil unions DON'T grant the same rights as marriage. Insurance policies, real property, personal property...all can be challenged in court by blood relatives in the event of the death of one of the partners especially if those relatives were intolerant of the lifetyle to begin with and many are...
besides...love is love...it isn't up to the ANYONE to say who can or can't get married under ANY circumstances....those restrictions are just a way for one group to impose their moral code on another...like ALL laws that have a moral implication...

Answer 5

Would you be satisfied? Let's say that you are a member of a religion - call it "C". And let's say the another religious group, call them "J", actually run the country and make the rules. Now the J's have very strict laws about marriage but since the C's don't follow the J's belief system the C's can't get married by definition.

But you can live together and the J's will give you a piece of paper that says that you are almost completely married.

How's that make you feel?

A

Answer 6

I'm not gay, but the reason *I* wouldn't be satisfied with that is because separate is not equal. There's no reason for the institution to have a different name, other than to keep it separate and thus unequal to heterosexual marriage.

It should all be marriage in the law, or everyone should have civil unions and make "marriage" a strictly spiritual term.

Answer 7

(1) The premise of your question appears to be that civil unions are allowed for gay people in most places. And that's not true.

(2) Your question also assumes that all gay people have the same opinion. We don't.

(3) Those of us who do not support the concept of civil unions consider it to be what it is: A purposeful slap in the face, because the message is that gay people are inherently less than, and that our relationships are inherently less than.

(4) If you do not believe people of the same gender should marry each other, that's your opinion. And no one is forcing you to do it. But it's not your business who I choose to marry.

Answer 8

Because it isn't just about rights...it is about being considered equals...I have a girlfriend and we are so in love and want nothing more than to be able to tell the world that we are married...but right now we are unable to do that. There are ways around getting the rights, there always have been. What we want is not to be able to tell people "Yeah, she is covered under my insurance" or "Yeah, I have a living will stating everything goes to her if anything were to happen to me" or anything of the sort...I want to be able to scream from the top of my lungs to anyone who will listen that I am in love with this woman and that now she is my wife...but it is people with opinions like yours who are stopping our dreams. What we want is simple, and soon things will change despite all of your efforts to keep us separate.

Answer 9

I like Blue Octagon's idea. Everyone is legally given a civil union, and marriages are held in church. That's actually a pretty decent compromise, from a legal viewpoint if not from a religious one.

Answer 10

Maybe because there are too many jerks around still claiming they are a little step above subhumans. I'd feel the same thing. Besides, they aren't granted anything. They earned their right.

Answer 11

Because they want to be on the same label as married couples , when their lives become miserable