They have been working backwards thru the bible.
They have just figured out how Moses parted the Red sea then caused it to cover and drown the egyptian army.
They have already proved Jesus's life from birth to death including all the details.
I'm hoping the next thing they learn about and explain is Noah and the Flood, then that will basically just leave Adam and Eve.
I've always used religion to help me understand science and science to help me understand religion so I find this fasinating that they have finally come together.
I've read where Quantum physics is beginning to explain creation and how exactly that happened.
Most of them I've gotten to know in the science forum are religious and tell me most people in science are.
The religious people can trust science because they are only looking for the facts and as they find them it's fasinating them also, science and religion are seeing eye to eye for a change.
2006-11-08 13:47:13 · 31 answers · asked by Sean 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Most of this stuff I watch on the history and science channels.
2006-11-08 14:13:58 · update #1
How about the fact that the entire scientific community accepts the age of the earth to be 4.6 billion years old?
I have no idea what sources you're reading from or even if you just made all that up, but science is in no way "proving" the Bible. If anything, it's proving that the Biblical creation story is even LESS likely to actually have happened than we originally thought.
Adam & Eve? Mainstream scientists laugh at that, man.
2006-11-08 13:49:20 · answer #1 · answered by . 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
True science has proved many things that were written about in the bible actually happened. And the bible is basically a chronology of events, so it is possible to be what actually happened. However, that doesn't mean that nothing else happened before or during the time is was written about, and it doesn't mean that evolution is not fact either
2006-11-08 14:48:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Moses didn't part the Red Sea. There is however, a tidal phenomenon that resylts in a part of it becoming very shallow occasionally.
There is no proof (apart from the bible) that Jesus actually existed.
If there was a great flood, where is the water now?
Quantum physics does not use god to explain creation
2006-11-08 13:51:44 · answer #3 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, well, well now.
What you just stated calls for a big Praise the Lord from whom all blessings flow.
I'm not surprised that science has finally step it up and realized that the Bible is true, reliable, and most of all infallible.
So all hats off and born again believers everywhere give a big Hallelujah to our Savior and creator, the Lord Jesus Christ.
May the Lord continue to cause science to further dig and collaborate his Word as total truth.
Let all Born Again Believers everywhere say........AMEN!!!!
2006-11-08 14:40:33 · answer #4 · answered by JOSEPH M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I totally believe SOME of what is in religious texts to be true and that even comes through in my cultural teachings. However SOME of the things that are in Relgious Teachings have been tampered with by man and that is a fact.
Even though some scientists are religious and looking for facts etc.. Do you think they may be bias with some of their findings? Just a question, dont take it personal.
It is always good to question things and ponder on the evidence.. can i ask where are your links to these findings are.
2006-11-08 14:02:06 · answer #5 · answered by *JC* 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ofcourse! God knows everything! Just like the science of biomimetics...science mimicking the designs of various creatures. Science is really just trying to figure out a reason why things work as they do, and trying to make sense of things, although some things may not make sense to science yet, with time they will...like you said, they are growing closer and closer together.
2006-11-08 14:52:06 · answer #6 · answered by wannaknow 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where have you been? The last 2 years? The springs (fountains) of the sea, and many other discoveries like proof of Pilot the ruler have been found during the past 50 years.
Josephus acknowledged Jesus. Josephus was not a Christian nor even a Jew. He did not believe God existed.
2006-11-08 13:53:07 · answer #7 · answered by mesquiteskeetr 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Except the events were a one in a million natural happening so you shouldn't say that Moses himself parted the seas, if you want to call it religious, and supposing all present believed god existed, then god parted the seas through the works of nature to help Moses.
And I'll believe more in Jesus when they present a body that they know with absolute certainty that it is him.
2006-11-08 13:50:18 · answer #8 · answered by spirenteh 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not sure where you've been getting your information but you might want to double check it. Every time a biblical story has been scientifically analyzed......it isn't, because there is nothing to analyze. No ark has ever been found, and the Red Sea has never spontaneously parted. Ergo, nothing to study. Jesus's existence has never even been proved through secular records, only religious texts. This is not to say that science has disproved religion, but that by its very nature (ie, faith in something that cannot be proven), religion is impervious to scientific study.
2006-11-08 13:52:13 · answer #9 · answered by John S 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Moses parted the Red Sea by the same principle as Minerva was born fully formed from the head of Zeus - it's called myth. The scientific community is overwhelmingly non-religious. And why in the name of Satan do you have an inverted pentagram icon???
2006-11-08 13:54:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋