Althogh I don't think so, because I don't think Jesus supports torture and murder, many republicans like to think they have control over the fundamentalist extremists in America.
http://flushaholybook.com
2006-11-08 11:19:06 · 9 answers · asked by holy_flush 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Having lived through several of these political cycles...God knows exactly what He is doing in our lives.
Each of us need to remember to be humble an submissive before God.
Maybe there is a greater good in the future that required the Republicans to step back and let the Democrats lead for now.
As a former Democrat I realize firsthand the problem with hubris.
2006-11-08 11:24:54 · answer #1 · answered by Lives7 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, there was a section of the news tonight that told percentages of who voted for what. And, it said 70% of the Evangelicals voted Republican.........that seems like a large amount, to me. They also said women were about 50-50, whereas they usually vote Republican. Life is interesting--------.
2006-11-08 11:38:13 · answer #2 · answered by Shossi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reagan did that. He won by mixing the conservative party with religious values. The values are a carrot dangled on the end of a stick, but that is how he resurrected the republican party.
2006-11-08 11:23:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
bear in mind there's a huge difference between well-being care and well-being coverage. the authorities has a duty to guard your good to receive get good of entry to to an similar high quality well-being care as everybody else has. they don't have the duty to grant well-being coverage for you, nor to pay for your well-being care. sure something else of the western international has socialized medicine. And something else of the international comes the following to the U. S. even as it extremely counts and they favor to get high quality well-being care. it really is because our device rewards high quality and theirs is doled out in equivalent-sized products by a bureaucrat. procuring everybody to have well-being coverage isn't an ethical good. If everybody has a good for well-being coverage, then what about automobile coverage? residing house coverage? legal duty coverage? And in the journey that they have got a good to residing house coverage, why do not they have a good to a house? in case you'll pay to insure that residing house, then you could pay for the residing house itself. I hate to imagine of the individuals who're one paycheck remote from being homeless. quite quickly you've communism, and we already recognize that doesn't artwork. the reason we are the "very last" us of a to socialise our therapy is because we go searching and observe it doesn't artwork. everybody is death in tremendous Britain on the prompt from cancers that are an insignificant inconvenience contained in the U. S., because we try for and manage those cancers early sufficient that they are many times cured. people contained in the united kingdom ought to attend in line for coverage and they are death. The Bible does not have something to assert about the morality of well-being coverage, so Jesus might want to both area with those who oppose nationalizing well-being care (not purely Republicans, by how) or he might want to inform you it doesn't count number.
2016-11-28 22:40:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Jesus said he is no part of the world. So he wouldn't favor any of the political parties we have today.
2006-11-08 11:23:17 · answer #5 · answered by linniepooh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Jesus wouldn't support any political party because they're both corrupt.
2006-11-08 11:20:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No tears in heaven.
2006-11-08 11:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by Justin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Question" is too statistically biased to consider.
2006-11-08 11:33:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dead people don't cry.
2006-11-08 11:22:00 · answer #9 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋