manizer? haha
oh yeah, and if you were to be a guy and be gay, would you be a "manizer"/if you were female and gay, would you be a womanizer also?
haha, just curious =)
2006-11-08 11:17:41 · 8 answers · asked by Michelle 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
maneater would be the female version, gay male version as well I suppose.
2006-11-08 11:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Define "excessive". Define the level of lust for females that distinguishes "womanizers" from non-womanizing heterosexuals. You will find that your use of terms is essentially arbitrary, and that you are just engaging in meaningless moralizing. The fact that women want to exploit men as money objects to pay for the babies they sh1t out does not mean that men are immoral for impregnating a lot of women!
2016-05-21 22:59:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Potentially "maneater", but that is far too vicious for a simple exploitator
2006-11-08 11:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hahahaha you took alot of time thinking that one through huh?? No idea on this one.
2006-11-08 11:19:48 · answer #4 · answered by michelle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
man hater.
2006-11-08 11:18:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hoe
2006-11-08 11:45:14 · answer #6 · answered by Terri L 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I guess it could be a whore.....
2006-11-08 11:20:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Skank
2006-11-08 11:27:01 · answer #8 · answered by James L 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋