have you tried this way when installing vits beta & you want to install it again .reformat da pc & install again but this beta version will will stop in june then ur have to buy vista if you want to go on using it .if testing out vista it is best if you install it on a back up hard drive not over win xp. as for vista i will not be moving upto that . no need win xp is fine. why go on payinging out more cash for this it is all chat chat on this new vista & many have had problem's with this new IE7 they dont like it & have gone back to IE6 windows vista has IE7 on it. & for what i read about vista they say it has more security on it then win xp. $300 for 1 cd. you may as well wait for it to come out & all pc compnay will have a oem version of vista installed on new pc. new pc.s will have a system restore cd. if in problme you can just do system restore from da cd. and all will go back to frist settings from new pc. that is da way to go . have new pc with vista already installed on pc. 1 vista cd $300 if broken you cant do anything you have to pay out again .. if yur new pc system restore cd is broken you can creat new one or call ur pc support line for them to send you new system restore cd to restore ur pc back to new from time you buy it & da already instlled vista will do da same as a full version of vista. there all da same
2006-11-08 11:03:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
in case you would be loading older application or making use of it with older legacy peripherals, them Vista could cutting-edge you with some stressful circumstances. while you're adept with computers you're able to be able to locate the residing house variations the two common and top rate somewhat stressful. Vista warns you approximately almost each and every thing.... it assumes you're an fool. and in case you turn off the characteristic that themes the warning they're going to decrease yet no longer be eradicated, yet each time you boot up it relatively is going to alert you which you at the instant are not receiving the warning it situation you need to have!! the only way that characteristic must be worse is that if it replaced into waiting to declare "I advised you so" it would then be the computerized version of your mom. Visa does nevertheless have some record flow velocity themes that are supposedly being addressed interior the 1st Vista provider %..... yet i do no longer understand while this is due out.
2016-10-15 13:20:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by als 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is funny. Your thought on only installing Windows Vista once is wrong.
If you look at the Windows Vista EULA, it now explicitly states that a user may "reassign the license to another device one time."
Keywords to note: "another device". There's nothing to say that you can't install it to the same device over and over again.
2006-11-08 11:06:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by CSharper 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have XP and have had to re-install more than once so yes I guess that sucks.
2006-11-08 10:59:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Later Me 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's not true, they were planning to go with that licensing scheme but decided not to:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/03/ms_vista_climb-down/
2006-11-08 11:02:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bamba 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it doesnt suck its just different to everybodys current perspective on windows as it changes many things...
it has some bugs but what new software doesnt
2006-11-08 10:59:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by irish_ash2006 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they just removed that feature. But yes it does suck.
2006-11-08 10:57:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mohammed R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it does the way it comes but after a couple of days of tweaking its a little better
2006-11-08 10:53:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by spankdis 5
·
0⤊
0⤋