China last year slaughtered over 50,000 dogs due to a scare of rabies. So one dog per family is a way to cull dogs.
2006-11-08 07:56:18 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets ➔ Dogs
I think it's outrageously stupid and cruel. Families should be allowed to have as many dogs as they want. Well, within reason. The Chinese should've created a vaccination for the rabies, not slaughtered innocent dogs.
2006-11-08 08:35:47 · answer #1 · answered by xprincess_porkiex 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think this is a horrible rule, however, China limits how many children you can have, why not limit pets? They do have a limited amount of space, so I guess I can see where that's going. Slaughtering of dogs just because they MIGHT have rabies? That's disgusting. Makes me want to hug my dogs when I get home!
2006-11-08 08:03:22 · answer #2 · answered by lil miss blue eyes 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, I don't think China should be allowed to have ANY pets. They had their chance, and they ruined it by killing the dogs. Tough sh*t China, if you want animals then you shouldn't be slaughtering them. All animals in China should be exported and no more animals should be taken in to China. Maybe if they are nice for the next 200 years and don't abuse any more animals then they can get some back.
2006-11-08 08:15:36 · answer #3 · answered by Rich 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I didn't hear that but it sounds intresting.Hum?...I wounder how they intend to get rid of the left overs and Farrel dogs? It's a well known fact that the dog like the rat are zodiac years signs but they eat their zodiac animals as well. they say it's good fortune I learned this when I saw them eating Bats! and Rats! Now that they have a plan to address the over population of Dogs, what are they going to do about the overcrowding of people?? dang....hope they get full on the critters first!! :)
2006-11-08 08:14:47 · answer #4 · answered by dhwilson58 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think they are facing the reality of their resources and the world in general in a rational way by limiting each family to one dog. If they can put a limit on children, why should dogs be more of an issue?
2006-11-08 08:06:31 · answer #5 · answered by secondwish02 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why don't they just require all dogs get rabies vaccinations? I think they've gone a little overboard. As intelligent as they are supposed to be they sure have a lot of problems. It's hard to believe only 30 percent of their dogs are vaccinated. So now it's one kid, one dog per family, what next?
2006-11-08 08:07:40 · answer #6 · answered by dolly 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not much different that the 2-3 dog limits in many townships in the states hugh? or the 3 PET limit (4 guppies & you're in violation)
2006-11-08 08:37:54 · answer #7 · answered by ragapple 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
its a great rule...Most of the population is in the urban areas. Think of all the waste the dogs would produce in those areas. While i think it will be hard to enforce in the countryside i think it is a good way to clean up the streets before the Olympics arrive
2006-11-08 08:05:27 · answer #8 · answered by jefferson 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's a bunch of bologna!! if they don't want the dog don't they just ship it to America or any other country that actually wants the dogs. look at all the dogs that are slaughtered over a year. i call you a murder!!!!! no offense to chines people or food but DAMN YOU CHINA!!!
2006-11-08 11:18:18 · answer #9 · answered by Weird W 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What do you think of the laws in the USA where you can only have 2??? Or 3???
Its a way of culling dogs here too. Thanks to the animal 'rights' groups for pushing these stupid laws.
2006-11-08 15:03:33 · answer #10 · answered by whpptwmn 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋