2006-11-08 02:26:42 · 7 answers · asked by Cinnamon 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There were Romans and Jews in Palestine around that time, there was a governer named Pilate and there were a lot of people claiming to be the Messaih and the Jews were revolting from time to time, and, er thats it basically.
2006-11-08 02:29:55 · answer #1 · answered by fourmorebeers 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Percentage wise, who knows? Since about 1825-quiet a bit. The real question is how much of the Bible can be proved false by historical text. Although many disagree with historical accounts in the Bible, they have no evidence to prove any event in the Bible false.
I did a brief study about 15 years ago. I was then, and still am today, convinced that anyone who says that the Bible is inaccurate has not really looked. They just have opinions based on opinions and no facts.
2006-11-08 10:35:14 · answer #2 · answered by Desperado 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Historical accuracy:
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a008.html
Science accuracy:
http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml
Textual accuracy http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/bib-docu.html
Anthropology accuracy
http://www.why-the-bible.com/anthropology.htm
2006-11-08 10:33:23 · answer #3 · answered by williamzo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
nearly every Bible story has archeological facts that surround it.
http://www.bib-arch.org/
http://www.concentric.net/~extraord/archaeology.htm
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/archeology.html
http://www.digbible.org/
2006-11-08 10:28:58 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. Linder 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
all of it,just get a concordance
2006-11-08 10:31:34 · answer #5 · answered by mrs.tweety305 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not much.
2006-11-08 10:28:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
why?
2006-11-08 10:28:46 · answer #7 · answered by daisy322_98 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋