2006-11-08 00:46:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
In continuation to SJM.... this would be about .001 mm- hardly measurable since water level in the seas is contiuously disturbed by waves, winds, et al.
In fact, in the long run the water level will actually rise!!!!!!!!!!!
here's how:
taking off all boats, trawlers, ships, et al implies no fishing, no oil extraction, no mining and other activities. the huge quanta of fish and other marine flora and fauna that will re-generate itself along with the sludge etc that comes in will actually raise water levels
2006-11-08 01:01:52 · answer #1 · answered by kapilbansalagra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The tonnage of a ship is the weight of the water it displaces. One cubic metre of water weighs one metric ton. If you take the total tonnage of all the ships in the world (in metric tonnes), then this represents the volume in cubic metres that the sea would drop by if all those ships were taken out of the water. If you divide this volume by the total surface area of the sea (in square metres) then you will get the height that the sea would fall by.
2006-11-08 00:53:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The ships and boats has no influence on the level of sea. They are just on it....So, there is nothing going down in the level of sea by your action...
No need to measure
2006-11-08 00:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i dont imagine there's a dramatic replace in water aspect because the burden of each and every boat or deliver is displaced by the buoyancy. besides, because of the international caution, water aspect is honestly increasing
2016-11-28 22:08:44 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Y ya asking this agen? The answer is just possibly enough drop to be equivalent to the thickness of a molecule of H2O
2006-11-08 00:55:05 · answer #5 · answered by scrambulls 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
once u kept all ships and boats on earth, then earth will go down,
as much as water. so diff!! hey, 'm kidding!! but crazy question!!
i don't think, the water vl go down, if u do so!!
2006-11-08 00:56:22 · answer #6 · answered by Vinay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the words of the magician, Paul Daniels, "Not a lot. Not a lot."
Sash.
2006-11-08 04:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by sashtou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the difference would be too small to measure
2006-11-08 00:49:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same old question, same old answer - not much.
2006-11-08 01:10:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't know but i find the topic interesting...
haha, i wonder how too....hmmmmmm
2006-11-08 00:50:28 · answer #10 · answered by il padrino 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋