2006-11-07 18:26:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Community Service
If the large organization has a central focus for practical matters, but also has a lot of local personal contact, then it can be advantageous to be large. But if any organization loses touch with the local interests, it threatens to lose touch with those it is designed to serve. If your "business" is helping people, then you have to be close to the people. Simple, obvious, but not always maintained.
2006-11-07 18:35:37 · answer #1 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
small drops make a big ocean. charity begins at home. if every one has the tendency to remain helpful to one another the question of big or small does not arise. what mattered most is the nobleservice to the society at large. however, organised efforts help to reach the downtrodden, effectively
2006-11-10 03:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by hari prasad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maximum agencies are basically as stable because of the fact the intentions of the folk working them. mutually because it somewhat is genuine that a great part of the money amassed choose for overhead fees, how might human beings donate on a great scale without those agencies. as an occasion, after typhoon Katrina might you only have mailed a verify to "Random guy or woman in New Orleans".
2016-10-21 11:20:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. You will have broad base and more committed and dedicated persons to offer their services. You get variety of ideas so that it attracts improvements
2006-11-08 13:14:57 · answer #4 · answered by bmdholakia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it is not a good idea
2006-11-07 20:26:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no...nothing gets accomplished
2006-11-07 19:46:22 · answer #6 · answered by -------- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes...huge IT saving....
2006-11-07 18:48:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋