because i know there's innocent ppl over their but give warning i guess. but we cant tell the difference between innocent and not. so i would just let them have it!! how bout you?
2006-11-07 13:51:21 · 17 answers · asked by jrobertson9907 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
i'de drop the Abom! i mean it is nothing but a mess bush has got us into over there countless american lifes has been lost to to his lack of balls to get the job done.we're killing innocent people over there everyday with our Bombs so as sad as it may sound, if we droped the A bomb, it would all be over! i feel this way because i served 3 years there during desert storm
2006-11-07 14:05:04 · answer #1 · answered by rpoker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As someone who strongly opposes the war in Iraq I would say no. There are just too many innocent people who would get killed. Thats like England (random place) bombing America because the skin heads commited an act of terrorism against England. Do skin heads make up all of America?? No, they do not. So should England Bomb all of America including non-militant areas, killing innocent men, women, and children in their war against Skin heads?
Just my sidenote: this is an analogy do not take it literally.
2006-11-07 22:01:50 · answer #2 · answered by Jillian 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, it sounds good to me but I would rather not bomb iraq because then all the work our troops have done over in iraq would all be for nothing. I would rather just gett our troops out of there and say the hell with iraq let them run things in their own country. all we are doing is pissing them off by staying and losing alot of good usa men.
2006-11-07 23:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we decide to bomb people for being ... what? For being Muslim? For being born (by choice, perhaps) in Iraq? Let's take this to another level: Since we can't tell innocent white americans from guilty white americans, should we bomb all of them, too? If you apply your above logic to Iraqis, you MUST apply it to all nations, all cultures and all peoples, including your own. that would make to "all right and fair."
2006-11-07 21:56:57 · answer #4 · answered by Eric 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Put all we got in bagdad an go to iran then syria an bomb the hell out of them an nver put a troop on the ground if you going to do it do it right the frist time
2006-11-07 21:58:39 · answer #5 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We're starting tonight, sending a strong message to the Senate and House, friend
2006-11-07 21:52:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Should we come over and bomb your town just because there are some criminals that live there that we want to get rid of? I didn't think so!!!
2006-11-07 21:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by unicornfarie1 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Washington State recently experienced an explosion that was more than seven thousand five hundred times more powerful than the bomb that was dropped on Japan in WW2.
What are you people afraid of?
Nuclear does not mean the end of the world. It only means the end of an era (our enemies of course)
GO TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!! YEA HAAA!!!!!!!
2006-11-07 22:01:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The option you proposed would be better, because it will save our young Americans to die every day in a non sense war that we will never win according with what we are seeing..âº
2006-11-07 21:58:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is the cradle of civilization....no wonder the world is less safe, with all these lunatics out there..
2006-11-07 21:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by seek_fulfill 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋