NO! The capital should be as near the center as practical. Kansas City would be best.
2006-11-07 11:30:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It was the Capital of the US, But now is the Capital of the world.
2006-11-07 22:29:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ccfromnj 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it's already the capital of the universe. This city is too important, anything happens will trigger a whole lot.
2006-11-07 15:25:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. you can't have the financial capital of the United States and the government capital be the same city...too easy to target and shut us down.
2006-11-07 11:13:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by chattykatty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. DC is a good capital for our government. NYC is the economic capital. It should stay like that.
2006-11-07 11:12:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Adam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US government is too large to cram it into New York City.
2006-11-08 03:16:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Albert 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, the designation of "capital" is fairly beside the point. the government can't purely flow to ny with the aid of traditions linked with the District of Columbia and there is no longer very nearly adequate room in ny. they could declare ny the capital yet stay in Washington D.C. yet what element could that serve?
2016-10-03 09:47:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, NYC is too crouded the way it is now...picture tons of immigrants and non-americans flocking to the city on vacation to visit the us capital...that would stink
2006-11-07 11:09:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wouldn't be any worse than DC.
2006-11-07 11:12:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-11-07 11:12:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Violet 3
·
0⤊
0⤋