2006-11-07 11:00:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ United States ➔ New York City
...its not?
hah jk; im always gonna remember albany because i missed that on a quiz back in the 9th grade.
ive been to both albany and nyc- and i think the nyc is amazing but it is too croweded and young-hearted to be the capital.
2006-11-07 11:09:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
maximum Capitals are extra major in route of the state, yet why might want to the placed the capital in long island city? besides the undeniable fact that that is named after the state, that is a wide thriving city. The capital may have difficulty looking area for homes, and long island does not favor the further charm. A city like Albany may not were an rather tremendous dot on the map if it wasnt for the capital, and it makes extra experience to placed extra jobs there than in a city it really is a significant city to commence with. also a number of those cities have grow to be very familiar presently so that they could not have looked like such tremendous cities even as the capitals were positioned.
2016-11-28 21:45:41 · answer #2 · answered by hertling 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NYC is already the world capital, and its city government is larger than most states' governments. Why add the state into the mix, too?
2006-11-07 11:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
New York is busy and crowded as it is. Why bring more traffic?
2006-11-07 11:03:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - Albany is perfectly adequate and centrally located.
2006-11-07 11:03:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. It it aint broke, don't fix it!
2006-11-07 11:08:16 · answer #6 · answered by peg 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
2006-11-07 11:05:03 · answer #7 · answered by cantstandrudeness 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋