English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-07 07:14:12 · 21 answers · asked by Pamela M 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

21 answers

just look at all the little punks running around shooting up schools. do you think they would be doing that if they had some sense beat into them? i don't think so. i say beat the fear of god into them.

2006-11-07 07:25:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

I definitely think that spanking is OK, but it should be used as a last resort only, and only if the parent isn't angry to the point where it's almost a beating. It's about time parents started to be parents instead of trying to be best friends with their children. Kids cannot negotiate with parents, and parents shouldn't even try. Parents are not taking enough resposibility with their kids. The unfortunate thing is if you do smack your kid for doing something wrong, social services comes running to your door! We live in a world where parents can no longer parent their children without someone screeching "Abuse!". No wonder so many kids are f*cked up today. Thanks government.

2006-11-07 07:37:35 · answer #2 · answered by chicyuna 5 · 3 1

Spanking is a somewhat apt punishment meted out via a discern or mum or dad to impart a lesson without inflicting harm. while a guy or woman hits somebody, it somewhat is often completed out of the two meaness, self-protection (that's ok), or the egocentric anger of no longer getting what they %. Spanking isn't sexual to any extent further than giving a baby a bathtub (which additionally incorporates touching). toddlers are spanked on the butt because of the fact it somewhat is a secure section without bones close to the exterior of the floor. I agree in telling toddlers to offer up first. it somewhat is while a baby does not supply up, or breaks a needless to say understood rule that spanking turns into mandatory. toddlers have been spanked for as long as parents have been having toddlers. it somewhat is because of the fact spanking has been shown to artwork, as antagonistic to time-outs that have basically grow to be everyday interior the final 30 years or so (until eventually you think of toddlers are lots extra suitable behaved in recent times, than they have been returned then). Even different animals alongside with cats and canines swat (or chew) their youthful. soreness is a well-known instructor, and it somewhat is the parents' job to coach toddlers stable conduct, practices, and attitudes. it somewhat is organic to weigh the hazards vs the rewards of doing what we %. Spanking enables, extra suitable than different punishments to triumph over the organic urge to do incorrect. a baby in the initiating would basically % to obey her parents because of the fact she is terrified of a spanking. by the years, obedience will grow to be a habit. a baby's habit is a pondered photograph of how properly the parents have taught. from time to time parents would desire to make annoying selections to marvelous misbehavior, undesirable attitudes, and to dodge destiny wrongdoing. toddlers at the instant are not granted the authority to spank. They an no longer do away with different human beings's privileges the two. they can't floor parents or stand them interior the corner.

2016-10-21 10:41:08 · answer #3 · answered by goodknight 4 · 0 0

Well, obviously, spanking (if done properly) is not going to cause any permanent harm to the kid.

Though, I think people should remember that when kids act up, it is their duty to discipline them. And disciplining them means teaching them right from wrong, not proving to the world what a big, bad-a$$ed disciplinarian you can be. Again, that does not mean that spanking are sometimes not necessary, because sometimes they are. I would explain further, but I think anyone with a brain can see what I mean by this.

Peace out.

2006-11-07 14:06:43 · answer #4 · answered by I'm Still Here 5 · 3 1

I was spanked and so was everyone else I know and we are all just fine. We arent out being violent etc....So I dont see why people think spanking is abuse. There is a HUGE difference between the two. You should definitley spank your child if they are endangering themselves or others. Some kids learn better by being spanked and some learn better with time out. It all depends on the child. Time out doesnt work worth anything. Ihave 3 boys and tried to use time out consistently. That was a joke. Never got through to them. Taking things away from them does work however and spankings work if they are absolutley necessary.

2006-11-07 07:38:06 · answer #5 · answered by Blondi 6 · 4 2

Well, I think children should get spankings. Corporal punishment, or punishment in schools, stopped a lot of the problems that occur in schools today. The teachers have no way to control the kids and spend the entire time trying to keep the "bad" kids quiet. I spank my child and proud of it. But guess what? I rarely have to spank him more than once for the same thing. He gets new spankings for trying new things. I always give him three warnings before he gets a spanking. I've tried time-outs (which can work for some children), but he just jumps up and thinks it's a game. Spanking is quick, easy and to the point.

2006-11-07 07:26:58 · answer #6 · answered by sillylittlemen 3 · 4 4

I think there is a BIG, BIG difference between a hit, beating, and a spanking. If you lean over and whack your kid in the head for being loud in a restaurant then this is hitting in my opinion. If you have repeatedly called your child down for the same poor behavior and then resort to a spanking across his bottom then I find no harm in this. As long as it's done within reason and not out of anger. I'm sure there will be many to disagree with me!

2006-11-07 07:21:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 10 2

If you are not going to whip the kids then you had better come up with something that scares them. Fact of the matter is that is why children behave, the fear of a punishment. Children do not fear time out, grounding, so forth. Don't missunderstand, it is never okay to beat a child, but a spanking when the time calls for it, which is not all the time, will work wonders.

2006-11-07 07:26:16 · answer #8 · answered by Casey 3 · 5 3

"whooping" teaches children to use violence when they are angry. I don't see how it could work, it's an easy way to discipline because you don't have to think I guess. I have no clue why someone would beat a child that they love.

2006-11-07 08:04:46 · answer #9 · answered by me 4 · 1 2

My opinion is that it teaches the child that when you can't get your way as an adult, all you have to do is smack whoever is standing in your way- and then that leads to more violence....

Discipline in other ways promotes a better thinking in that child, and teaches them that violence doesn't solve everything.

I'm against spanking, but not against discipline. When the time comes, my daughter will know this.

2006-11-07 08:37:49 · answer #10 · answered by ♥Pamela♥ 7 · 1 2

I do not know. A lot of years ago if a parent need to spank their children they did it. Today if you spank a children they tell you "I will call the police on you. I think that is the first word that they learn. Instead say "papa" they saying "police" it's a joke

2006-11-07 07:36:21 · answer #11 · answered by annie 1 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers