the second question was who would win a fight between kimura and lee. nobody had kimura to beat lee, but many people had helio gracie to beat lee, ok so here is the question, kimura beat helio gracie easily so why do people think helio would fair better in a fight with lee then kimura would
2006-11-07 05:17:56 · 10 answers · asked by faveraus 2 in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
STOP WITH THESE DUMB vs. QUESTIONS!!!!
It all depends on who is the better fighter that day... I could whoop Helio Gracie in his prime if he slipped and I got a lucky 1 and a million punch to his temple.... ITS ALL A GAME OF CHANCE!!!!!
RARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
2006-11-07 05:31:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nobody will ever know. I personally think Lee would easily have beaten Helio Gracie. However, with Kimura, it would have been a close fight, possibly a long fight. But I have to go with Bruce Lee just off of his martial arts knowledge and his incredible combination of speed and power. Alot of people bring up this thing about Lee being submitted on the ground, but the person would have to get him on the ground first. He could snap a back fist to your nose or a side kick to the head before you even made a move and it would be lights out. And he was still trained in Grappling, so he knew the moves.
2006-11-09 14:32:24 · answer #2 · answered by DJ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jim Kelly trained with the Gracies, yet says Lee was the best and that nobody could beat bruce lee in his era.
We have a generation of martial artists who sparred with bruce lee who said his ability was overwhelming. Whereas with Helio his fights lasted hours at a time. So with Helio you never really know.
My moneys on Bruce lee all the time.
2014-08-05 09:29:49 · answer #3 · answered by victor c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually I replied to that thread with Kimura as the winner but my post got 2 thumbs down by Bruce Lee fan boys.
Kimura would crush Bruce Lee without even thinking. People were saying "Oh but he just does Judo, Bruce has done 3 martial arts!!!@#@!" Yeah, 3 terrible martial arts.
Kimura would have atleast 40 - 50 kilos on bruce. Plus being a judo god he would eat Bruce for breaksfast.
Final note: Bruce Lee is an actor not a fighter. Kimura is a Judo legend. For those kiddies that don't know, Judo is a extremely effective Martial art, unlike someothers like wing chun, crazy monkey kung fu, yabble dabble KIA karate.
2006-11-07 15:39:03 · answer #4 · answered by r e c 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Maybe people don't know the history of Kimura? He was a legendary Judo fighter.
I don't think Bruce Lee is really in the same league as Gracie or Kimura because he didn't have as much competition. Bruce Lee was an actor as much as a martial artist. Those two guys were all geared toward actual real fighting.
2006-11-07 13:51:26 · answer #5 · answered by Bruce Tzu 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
dido with brian b why ask such stupid questions the question you should ask is what is the fight card for UFC 65 or do you think Ortiz can beat Liddel at UFC 66 not is Bruce lee a good fighter well of course he is
2006-11-07 20:59:48 · answer #6 · answered by Heel of Y! Answers 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why ask these questions. They are all speculative and there are no real answers. The opinon answers all don't make sense. The "who would win" thing is ridiculous, pointless, and neverending because there is no answer.
Think logically for a moment how the fighters of today have changed over the years. Wouldn't these people have adapted and changed.
2006-11-07 13:32:34 · answer #7 · answered by Brian B 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i agree with hood about the questions.bruce lee was not just an actor if you think he wasn't proficient in martial arts you need to do some more research.
2006-11-07 18:16:21 · answer #8 · answered by BUSHIDO 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Seriously, bruce lee would beat any boxer or wrestler any time.
2006-11-08 04:02:30 · answer #9 · answered by Elite117 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bruce would win!
2006-11-07 13:50:13 · answer #10 · answered by mikers 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋