Evolutution violates and contradicts a certain scientific law?

Question

What scientific law does evolutuion contradict?

Answer 1

The theory of evolution is based upon many well placed assumptions. this theory means we guess......................There are undisputable Laws of Thermodynamics,when understood, that smashes the theory of evolution into a million little pieces. Then we have to look elsewhere for the real source of life!........The two Laws of Thermodynamics stated:1)the first Law is energy conservation. Energy can be converted from one form to another, yet the total amount of energy remains unchanged .Energy is neither being created not destroyed at the present time. 2) the second is the Law of decay. It affirms that although the total amount of energy remains unchanged there is always atendency for it to become less available for useful work.There is a universal tendency toward DECAY and deteriation,a transition from a more orderly state, to aless orderly state, finally to deenergization. In other words, the earth is running down...........Notice the absolute Law fo Thermodynamics that has been proven and the theory of evolution that CANNOT be proven.Evolution says we are evolving upward to a better condition. the second absolute Law of Thermodynamecs proves we aredecaying-not evolving to a better state....The theory of evolution implies increasing organizaton and complexity in the universe and is in effect a doctrine of continuous creation. The first Law of Thermodynamics arrirms that creation is no longer occurring,while the second Law states that the original creation is decreasing in organization and complexity.

Answer 2

If it is a genuine law of nature, which is what I assume you mean by a scientific law, you can't violate it. It is unfortunate that the word "law" is used here, because it suggests something that is enacted and carries a penalty for violating it.The laws of nature are simply descriptions of what happens under a given set of conditions. They can be demonstrated, but not violated. The law of gravity states that an object unsupported in a gravity field will fall. If you jump from a high place and are killed you haven't been punished for violating the law of gravity, you have just given an example of its universality. The problem, of course, is that sometimes people think something is a universal phenomenon when it really isn't. The "luminiferous ether" that supposedly pervaded the whole universe and carried light waves is one example, phlogiston is another. We don't know everything, and some things we can never know, so it is possible that some event may be found that violates what we now think is a scientific law, but if such is found it will really mean that the "law" was not really a law to begin with. The exception disproves the rule.

Answer 3

None of them.

The answer you're looking for is the Second Law of the theory of thermodynamics. "In any closed system, entropy will increase."

Problem with that assertion:

1. Earth is not a closed system. It receives a continual input of energy from the sun.
2. Order can increase if it is associated with a greater increase of entropy. That is, if you dissolve some sugar in water, you have a certain amount of entropy. If you let the water evaporate out, the water vapor is *HIGHLY* entropic, but the sugar crystals left are slightly ordered. The overall change is towards entropy.
3. Order is assured to come from energy input IF the energy input into the system is in a form capable of doing more work than the energy emitted. Sunlight has a high ability to do work; the Earth maintains balance by radiating the energy in the form of heat, which has low ability to do work (effectively, none).

Evolution violates no known theory of science. Further, the 'Second Law' is a misnomber, a semantic error. "law" was used in the early years of formal science because scientists believed that's what they were finding. We now know that we can never establish and prove a law -- science is in the employ of DISPROOF, not PROOF. The Theory of Thermodynamics is the proper term, and it consists of four principles, that for historic reasons, continue to be called laws (Zeroth Law is the fourth I refer to -- recent addition.)

Answer 4

well it not only breaks the second law of thermodynamics it doesnt make any sense
never in the history of man kind have we seen anything come from from nothing
it breaks another law
cant remember the name
the one that says "matter cant not be created or destroyed it can only change form"
what evolution says is that in the begining there was nothing and that nothing was flosting around in space and then all of a sudden that nothing blew up and became the whole universe
yea thats makes a lot of sense
let me give you an example if i handed you a pile of rocks that had two arrow heads in it would you be able to tell me which ones had been hand made
yes
because in the arrow heads we can see intelligent design
its the same thing with creation even if you look at one atom you have to see intelligent design
let alone a molecule or a cell or a leaf or a human
we couldnt have come from nothing we are too complex
telling me that we came from nothing is like me telling you that i threw a bomb into a junk yard and got a 747
that is perfectly capable of flying

one variation of evolution says that we have mutated from goo
another thing that we have never seen is something that mutated into something better

and that crap that says human DNA is 99% the same as a chimps we that is BS
the evolutionists only see what they want to see and when they are gaining there "facts" they only see what they want to
certain parts of our DNA may look like a chimps but not all of it
the closest thing that human's DNA is to is actually mice
now please
we are not desended from mice

so ya if you believe in evolution you are truly biased and are not looking at all of the facts
nor do you want to
it takes more fatih to believe in evolution then it does to believe in a intelligent creator

Answer 5

People claim that it breaks the law of entropy, also known as the second law of thermodynamics. However, the earth is not a closed system so this law would not apply to evolution...

Desperado: Get educated. I learned about this in 10th grade physics, it really astonishes me how ignorant people are of the world around them. So stop being fed information by creationist scientists who have no idea what they are talking about and learn something for yourself...

Answer 6

I do not agree with evolution but I have enclosed some articles that might give you some food for thought. I hope you enjoy them and the other links associated with them.

Is It Unscientific To Believe In God?
http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2004/6/22/article_01.htm
Can Science help You To Find God?
http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2004/6/22/article_03.htm

Answer 7

The theory of evolution contradicts MANY scientific laws. Most are just plain common sense

I have read some about the second law of thermodynamics- I have some understanding so far but don't undersand enough to comment on it right now

other scientific laws are just plain common sense!

life comes from life- life cannot evolve from nonliving things

each species produces after its own kind- one species of animal cannot give birth to a different species- different characteristics maybe but not a different animal altogether

Answer 8

You are probably trying to think of the second law of thermodynamics, since that is one of standards used in trying to shoot down evolution. This law states that the total entropy (chaos) of any isolated thermodynamic system will increase over time. What people fail to realize is that this law only applies to closed systems. The Earth is not a closed system, energy is received by the sun.

Answer 9

None. The anti-evolution crowd likes to claim that it contradicts the second law of thermo-dynamics. However, what they fail to realize, is that that law refers to closed systems. We are not a closed system. We receive massive amounts of energy from the sun on a daily basis.

Answer 10

All's I know, is that What we know is but a fraction of how the universe actually works. We can only use the senses that we have been given, which have been developed on this phyisical plane. So all that is physical is subject to the physical. There is no contradiction, there is only inadequate information.