forget communist
facist white bastards are da problem
viva la raza
2006-11-07 02:52:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Your question raises an interesting question in itself. Are you going to ignore all the other factors in letting a free market fix them? The Reagan years showed that when business is given the opportunity to save money, the money does not 'trickle-down' to the employees, yet went to the leaders of the company in bonuses.
Other parts of businesses are kept artificially high or low. The price of wheat and corn, high tax breaks(not an evil thing), taxing gasoline, etc.
What do you care about? People being able to live? If you make minimum wage, you are in poverty.
I think you meant to say socialist because communism brings a whole different ball of wax.
2006-11-07 11:01:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by RJ 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. It is slightly socialist. However, it would protect what is our culture, which requires a certain amount of wealth throughout the spectrum. Others coming here don't want to change that, they just want the wealth from our system to go to them, too.
However, the resulting influx DOES change that, turning the worker class into a poverty class, raising crime, and decreasing social civility.
Communism is a matter of redistribution not protectionism.
2006-11-07 11:05:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Send Mexico home...
Support the US Border Patrol!
2006-11-07 11:25:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tinking with the market in that way is something that Communists would approve of.
2006-11-07 10:54:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by C = JD 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No more communist than it is to subsidize the manufacture of automobiles and gasoline prices.
2006-11-07 10:47:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by monsoon05 2
·
1⤊
0⤋