English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

It was a loss of innocence for both Autralia and New Zealand. Neither country had any direct reason to be going to war aside from a deep, unquestioning loyalty to Britain. Gallipoli was the hard slap to the face, that woke them up to the reality of being colonials! They realised from it that they were seen as mere canon fodder by the the British, and at the same time a brotherhood was borne out of the pain and blood of their experience. Despite a variety of petty squabbles over the years, the ANZAC spirit is still strong in the minds of both countries, and I would say that the vast majority of people on both sides of the Tasman still feel that bond!

2006-11-09 21:50:31 · answer #1 · answered by psydwaindah 2 · 0 0

i'm not likely to do all of your homework for you, yet there are some education the following for you. at first you'll want to obviously describe what the ANZAC legend actual is. There are some myths about the Gallipoli adventure. there's a difficulty-loose false impression that the Australian and New Zealand troops were slaughtered because of the incompetance of British (English Generals). The Gallipoli adventure became felt very strongly in Australia and New Zealand because it became the first time their troops had fought as different gadgets. there is little question they fought quite skillfully and bravely. in spite of the indisputable fact that uk troops bore the brunt of the casualties (21,000 useless compared to 11,000 useless ANZAC troops) finally one quote, from Kemal Attaturk, the finest Minister of Turkey after the warfare, continually strikes me to tears. "those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives... you at the instantaneous are mendacity contained in the soil of a delightful u . s . a .. subsequently relax in peace. there's no distinction between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us the position they lie part by technique of part now the following in this u . s . a . of ours... You, the moms, who despatched their sons from remote countries wipe away your tears; your sons at the instantaneous are mendacity in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives in this land, they have change into our sons besides."

2016-11-28 21:08:16 · answer #2 · answered by picart 4 · 0 0

Additional to the previous answer, it was the first time that both countries acted not as dependent colonies of the UK, but took actions on an international platform and showed own responsibility.
It had a huge impact on their self esteem and the self awarness of both countries started to raise.

2006-11-08 10:47:00 · answer #3 · answered by markus0032003 4 · 1 0

They were commanded by a group who sent them into a no-win situation as so much cannon fodder. They vowed to never go into battle under a foreign leader thereafter. That is what they remember in NZ, along with their dead.

2006-11-09 11:37:31 · answer #4 · answered by Carol 2 · 0 0

It shows how both australian and new zealanders were brave enough to fight a battle they knew they couldn't win. wel that is what is the normal perception of it in australia

2006-11-06 20:45:18 · answer #5 · answered by whay i lost my ?s 6 · 1 0

mateship

2006-11-10 00:04:26 · answer #6 · answered by John B 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers