Things like pre-marital sex, unmarried co-habitation, etc., etc.
2006-11-06 11:57:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sure and then i can legally stone my neighbor to death for planting corn and potatoes in the same field.
and i can buy slaves from neighboring countries, would states be considered small countries today?
and i could have sex with my wife's maidservent..
and none of this is considered immoral in the bible.
on the other hand we would only have nuns walking around on the streets.
2006-11-06 12:11:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's stupid. Do you plan to throw 95% of the population in jail? What the hell would that purpose serve? Your 'sexual immorality' hurts no one. It's bad enough we're already filling our prisons with non-violent offenders - where do you plan to get the money from to imprison that many people?
Really, think before you ask a question next time.
2006-11-06 12:01:56 · answer #2 · answered by eri 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Supporting prison time for acts which are legal? Not a good idea.
No doubt there would be little problem finding someone willing to cast the first stone.
2006-11-06 12:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by davidscottwoodruff 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buddy-----we haven't got enough prisons as it is.
Besides, if you put everyone in prison that has done the above at least once-----there would not be anyone on the streets.
2006-11-06 12:01:16 · answer #4 · answered by rangedog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why should people be in prison for that?
Maybe most people will be in prison if that actually happens.
2006-11-06 12:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by Err 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, but I do support prison time for people who think they have the right to pry into others' personal lives.
2006-11-06 12:00:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
we would run out of prisons quick--maybe we should send all the people who aren't doing that to protect them from real life
2006-11-06 12:04:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not unless one of the participants is a minor or someone who is being coerced or forced.
2006-11-06 12:01:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fourtunately we dont live in the 12 century anymore,
so...Noooooooooooooooooo, I definetely do not support it!:)
2006-11-06 12:15:02 · answer #9 · answered by TranquilStar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Noooo... that would be nuts.
2006-11-06 12:01:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋