English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I like the concept of heating only the room being used. I have a space heater but am not satisfied with it's performance. I've read promotional litearture on the quartz infrared portable heaters and I like what I hear. It sounds like just what I'm looking for. Any information, pro or con would be greatly appreciated

2006-11-06 10:05:17 · 4 answers · asked by ffrankon1 1 in Science & Mathematics Engineering

4 answers

Does the "promotional litearture" keep you warm? Try burning it, that might produce some heat.

$300 is too much, you need that money to pay your heating bill. Anyway, I seriously doubt quartz is any more efficient than a cheap space-heater. They're both 100% efficient at converting electricity into heat. To improve on that you need a "heat pump".

Those are just an air-conditioners that are turned around, so that instead of pumping heat out in the summer, they pump heat inward in the winter. To use one you need a source of heat that is above 40-50 deg.F, such as well water.

You can als:
dress more warmly
turn up the thermostat
get another space heater
add insulation to your house

2006-11-06 10:21:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why would you select a quartz heater. No matter whether it is a quartz or wire coil heater, it will put out exactly as much heat as any heater with the same output rating, and consume the same energy. I saw a quartz heater for about $39 on Shopzilla. The difference in your satisfaction will be in how the heater or heaters distribute. Of course one wants them to have fans.

I have a solar system large enough to supply all my electrical energy. I heat the house with two 1.500 watt resistance heaters, the electric oven (sometimes), and frequent fires in the fireplace insert.

2006-11-06 14:23:28 · answer #2 · answered by Ed 6 · 0 0

Heres the rest of my answer which got cut off still on WWE cons Same Old Sh*t: Nothing ever seems new or different in the WWE its just the same guys facing off against each other mostly because WWE half@*** pushes guys towards the main event. But it really is getting tiring of seeing Orton, trips, cena, batista, edge, and taker facing off against the same guys over and over and over. The HHH vs Orton and Orton vs Cena Feuds are prime examples it was too much last year and got extremely boring. Those fueds were a big part of why I only occasionally watch WWE anymore because I am tired of seeing the same crap every PPV. Tag Division: Hart Dynasty is the only real tag team in it, and shomiz and truth and morrison wont be together 3 months down the line nuff said. PPVs: They Cost 50 bucks a piece and they are decent at best. Take mania for example my sister ordered it and she invited me over to watch it I was like why not at least Im not the one wasting money. So I go to watch it honestly it seemed like just another WWE PPV and I wasn't really impressed by any match on the card. If WWE is supposed to be the best promotion out there and they are putting on shows like that as their self entitled grandest stage of them all. It is sad. And to all the people who actually think that 26 was a great mania let alone a great PPV go back to the years 2001 - 2005 for WWE and look at some old PPVs back then they extremely better. WWE can do much better than they are but choose not to because they know people no matter what will spend money to buy them its sad really. if TNA wasn't what got me into wrestling in 2003 I probably wouldn't watch it right now. And if danielson wasn't on NXT(the only WWE show I watch consistently) and swagger didn't just become champ I wouldn't watch WWE either. So to all the people who are all about WWE vs TNA really it doesn't matter since both promotions aren't that great right now. I suggest you try watching ROH and DGUSA better wrestling and their PPVs dont cost more than 20 bucks. But if thats a little "too much" wrestling for you and you need more "entertainment", even though the sport is called Pro Wrestling and you can never have enough, then watch PWG and Chikara its wrestling but with comedy and is highly entertaining.

2016-03-17 06:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you'r talking a residental room, you're pretty much limited to 1500 watts. More than that you'll trip a breaker. It doesn't matter what you're using, all the heat is transferred into the room, the only difference is how much heats the air, and how much heats objects by radiation. A bunch of ordinary light bulbs would be the cheapest, the light and heat is as efficient as you'll get.

2006-11-06 10:37:22 · answer #4 · answered by mt_hopper 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers