Winston Churchill claimed that he was descended from an American Indian, through his American mother, about four generations before he was born. Though I myself am apparently pure Irish, I suspect that I have Viking blood, as many Europeans have through rape or abduction (as in the Charlton Heston film, "The War Lord."
2006-11-06
07:50:00
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Genealogy
I don't identify with the Irish, whom I judge to be dreamy cowards. I'm more like their hero Michael Collins, which means I suspect he too must have had dominant genes from a non-Irish ancestor.
The Nordics aren't Aryans. Their stupid, slavish behavior, compensated by subhuman savagery, indicates that, except in language, they were predominantly related to the Neanderthalian European aborigines. I wonder if DNA can go back far enough to show this second White race, which was conquered by and interbred with Indo-European invaders around 2,000 BC.
2006-11-07
03:48:39 ·
update #1
Language itself has a DNA. The Ancient Greek "haplos" used in HAPLOGROUP is, I'm pretty sure, related to the English SIMPLE through the common Indo-European mother language. Even more relevant to my theory about our aboriginal ancestors is that words that are not related to other European language groups came from the languages of the aborigines. Second, that sound changes, such as the above "s" for "h," were not adopted over the course of time, as Grimm's Law would have us believe, but were made because the aborigines had no "s" or "h" in their own languages and so changed the pronunciation of their specific Indo-European conquerors.
2006-11-07
04:03:02 ·
update #2