why or why not?
2006-11-06 06:50:14 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
heck no...that's horrible why would you forcefully remove a person body part...were not going to cut of your ears. there is no medical reason to do circ. there is not a single medical organization in the world that recommends routine circ. circ is a cruel barbaric outdated procedure done for docs to make money...lots of money...200.000 dollars in 20 mins kinds of lots of money. sex with intact men is better for both parties...its sex the way nature intended it. if nature didn't intend for their to be a foreskin in sex men would not have one. think about it use your brains people do you think it would be there for no good reason. we don't cut off body parts with out reasons. i do not understand why men in this country are not angry about this abuse. i guess many are ignorant to what they are lacking...i sure know the intact men i know are well aware of what they have. if it was mandatory...i know my intact male friends would leave the country before letting some one mutilate their genitals. this is the most disgusting question. no one should ever have to have anything like this done mandatory...heck vaccinations are not even mandatory...and those actually have a health benefit. your question horrifies me that people would ever have such extrme thoughts... let people stay how they are and do whats healthy not what society thinks might be pretty...what's next breast implants for all a cup women...or maybe cliping labia to make them the right shape and size?! I'm sorry if your parents didn't love you enough to leave you intact, but thats not a good reason to go around wishing it upon others. edited to add: its not cleaner to be circ...all you have to do is gasp wash...are men so lazy and stupid that they cant wash? i think not...the men i know are pretty together people that are capable of washing...also babies feel pain the same as adults. pain isnt about memory its about the moment your feeling it to say oh they wount remember doesnt matter. it happend they suffred thats all that matters. babies ussally sleep the whole next day and are cranky too after its done. its also been known to cause problesm with breast feeding as they often will not feed afterwards. edited to add even more...i'm dumfounded by the idiot comments on here... the pure misinformation....but i guess that is how circ is contiuned. oh and i know lots of gales that love intact (uncut) men...they are better lovers seems to be what i hear during girl talk....and they are not ugly...they are sexier...i'd have to move to europe where they dont torture boys, if all men were circed here....
2006-11-07 14:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Absolutely not, circumcision causes irreversible damage to the penis; overwhelming evidence and common sense supports that fact. Even if circumcision has health benefits, that doesn't mean it needs to be done. Besides, modern medicine and hygiene (which is actually very easy) are infinitely better at preventing health problems. Not one medical organization recommends routine infant circumcision. Personal opinions should be left entirely to the person, the individual, no one else. Religious reasons aren't valid either. Babies can't have faith in their circumcision until they're old enough to fully understand it, so circumcising them does absolutely nothing to show their faith. Forcing such religious faith on someone isn't really religious faith at all, simply because it's not their choice. It makes me absolutely sick to my stomach that people will actually force their children to go under the knife just because their religion or culture tells them to. It seems that some people care more about what other people think rather than the safety and will of their own child.
2016-05-22 04:50:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a decission parents make and their religions.
The differences are: when circumsised as a baby, they don't really remember the pain. There is pain when their older. How many men want that??
Hearing from men, I hear they have stronger orgazims when their NOT circumsised, but they also get infections easier, because of the extra skin not being cleaned enough.
Men that have been, don't spread as much bad bactirias during sex, and have less infections.
2006-11-06 06:57:02 · answer #3 · answered by peggin_beast 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
From what I have read on the subject, it is a procedure based on ancient beliefs with no real benefit. As long as good hygiene is taught and practiced, there is no reason to believe it is needed.
2006-11-06 06:53:37 · answer #4 · answered by Rich B 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
no - it should be a choice. Every person believes in different morals and values. There is nothing wrong with an uncircumsized man, and if a parent chooses not to do it, then it should be their choice.
2006-11-06 06:53:47 · answer #5 · answered by Amanda SSS 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, it is the parents choice. Usually people have it done or not done based on religion or culture. I personally prefer a circumsized guy but that's because I don't know that I've ever actually seen someone who hasn't had it done.
2006-11-06 06:56:15 · answer #6 · answered by Pirate Hooker 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no.because we live in america and things like that are personal choices and should not be mandated by laws.
2006-11-06 06:53:20 · answer #7 · answered by punkin 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
its my body part my choice...how dare anyone decided for me. i should have that choice to make on my own. i can't believe people still think this is okay!
2006-11-08 16:26:41 · answer #8 · answered by nikki 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$
MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!
In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
Also, if you examine the bible, lest just say that is full of terrible things that are considered very illegal nowadays, and many of those terrible things are AGAINST WOMEN. Women, how would you like it if those things get legalized?
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/
HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Women are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.
MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. It is not a birth defect! A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And what is even greater is the chance of breast cancer so the best thing to do is to remove the breast glands of young girls or at least remove them at the first sign of trouble without trying any alternative treatments first in order to preserve the breast(women, how do you like it now?). And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.
SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens. The frenulum is the G SPOT in men.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!
If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html
2006-11-06 18:59:16 · answer #9 · answered by killbadone 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's none of YOUR business what I or any other guy does with his sword, I'll tell you THAT much.
2006-11-06 06:52:38 · answer #10 · answered by TheOneVersion3.0 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋