English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In October 2001, Democrat Senator Walter Campbell issued the Scarlet Letter Law...A law that stated that all Florida women that were wanting to put their child up for adoption would have to publically state their names, age , race, sex, and all their sexual partners in the newpaper...the add would run once a week for four weeks straight...this was was only effective for 18 months..However, is trying to become reeenacted again...

This law would alos apply to all rape victims as well...
Do u believe that it would possibly increase the number of abortions performed?

Does it violate the privacy issue??

Whats next from the Govermant are they going to have everyone that is HIV positive publically state their names too with all their sexual partners...

This could be done in a better way without humiliating the woman d u agree?

2006-11-06 04:22:30 · 2 answers · asked by coopchic 5 in Pregnancy & Parenting Other - Pregnancy & Parenting

2 answers

Why the hell would they pass that law? That fluggin nuts! It's not a punishment to want the best for any child! We are an adoptive/Foster family. We have adopted twin boys when they were 2, we are fostering to adopt a baby girl, and we are also in process of adopting the twins little brother now. We are pro choice, but thanks to decision to allow their children to be adopted, there are many many families out there! I suspect you are right about abortion percentage possibly increasing. This law is a terrible reason for making that choice just that much harder for women.

2006-11-06 04:32:37 · answer #1 · answered by ♀♥☼ alycat☼♥♀ 3 · 2 0

i dont agree with it, I think that if the pregnant mother chooses to go through with the pregnancy and is willing to give the baby to loving parents who might not be able to have their own, what business is that of ours. I dont believe in abortion, but i guess its better for some to have one then to find their child in a garbage can somewhere. as for the HIV cases that would not be a bad idea since so many people still continue to have unprotected sex after finding out they carry the disease

2006-11-06 04:33:00 · answer #2 · answered by kittykat 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers