Xtreme global warming is enevitable! why are we not building more space stations for the future?

Question

the more people that experience space travel the better for all mankind!

Answer 1

Yes Extreme global warming is on the way. But you need to take into account the resources that would be necessary to put 6 billion people into space and then support them. The planet does not have that kind of mineral wealth to do such a project.

We as a planet need to get back to basics and not continue in the headlong flight of fancy toward destruction that our current "advanced" civilization is taking us. Moving back to an agrarian society would be the only way to reverse our impact on the global weather.

Sorry to say that it is not going to happen.

Answer 2

Must be the most illogical question for some time! Are the 2 questions some how connected? Have you any idea of the cost of building space stations? I don't think there's much chance of them being built so that more people can experience space travel. What would be the benefits to mankind?

Answer 3

Space is polluted enough with all the old satellites garbage. Why pollute it more by putting in space stations.

1st we'd colonise the moon, then the next planet and the next planet and the next planet and do exactly what we have done to earth and the there will be nowhere else to ago.

We should think more about improving things on earth before we even think about space stations.

I personally don't fancy staying in a place where I can't get outside unless I wear a breathing suit.

Answer 4

the thought that this could be a "Gore element" is absurd. SCIENTISTS (people who somewhat be taught issues and comprehend what they are talking approximately) all see what's occurring. whilst will the anti-certainty crowd draw close this consumer-friendly thought? it is not approximately Gore. it is approximately information and reason and technological expertise. You seem to think of that ignoring certainty is ultimate to dealing with it. If a deliver is sinking, you think of it is greater useful to faux all is definitely, somewhat than doing what could be achieved to maintain lives. Few people who've a sprint of a clue dispute the reason. we are the reason. returned, Gore did no longer invent this. He has been listening to those who comprehend what they are talking approximately. all the persons who've been saying Gore invented this thought have been the two deluded or mendacity. what's occurring in our environment isn't comparable to what's occurring someplace else. we've been changing the ambience; refusing to nicely known that have no greater suitable than one operative recommendations cellular. that's guy-made. we could substitute what we do. that's unlike an drawing close asteroid -- that's our doing; it is not day after today and not something we are able to do approximately it; that's a sluggish technique, and, being the reason, we could end contributing to it. If we shop up dumping greenhouse gasses interior the ambience on an identical fee, we are hurting ourselves and another residing element. If we end, we've a raffle to opposite it. If people who stored disregarding the subject might get a sprint of a clue, we could opposite the wear. Making variations to help the area is a lot greater useful than pretending there is not any subject, and wishing it weren't so. In different words: sure, it feels good to faux there is not any subject. That ensures the subject gets worse. OR we are able to stand certainty, and customary sluggish, then end, the wear we are doing. Rational people desire to remedy the subject. You, curiously, do no longer care how lots injury we do; in spite of everything, being heartless and braindead is greater basic for persons who've neither recommendations nor coronary heart.

Answer 5

Because space stations cost billions of pounds. When the technology becomes cheaper then it will be affordable and practical to build loads of stations. Also, blasting rockets into space is costly and is damaging to the environment. Greener propulsion methods, and cheaper technology is what is needed (plus loads more) to make space travel affordable for the masses.

Answer 6

Well, given the current state of the technology, think of all the propellants used to lift an insignificant weight into orbit and the amount of greenhouse gases that would be generated. Nice idea, but no we're still no further ahead than the comic book fantasies of the previous century!

Answer 7

so its inevitable now, eh? I'm not sure how space stations would lessen the effects of global warming? Unless you think stations equal space travel, whereby we move en-mass to another planet to mess that one up too?

Answer 8

No it is not, global waring is a falacie which is used to control and tax us even more.