Do you think that Britain should lead the next NATO invasion or should we let the Americans take the lead once more?
2006-11-06 02:37:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
the best answer... REALLY is to have the American soldiers (for No's and equipment) led by British Military Commanders. we UNFORTUNATELY couldn't lead NATO, as a country.
2006-11-06 02:45:15 · answer #1 · answered by Bmp1ksh 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Assuming you really want an answer to this question:
That's rather broad to just say 'Hey, we'll lead the way next time!' without considering size and scope of the operation. Military campaigns, especially between nations, is suppose to take a lot into account. Is it possible to have a campaign led by the Brits? Absolutely. It's usually a measure of proximity, resources, politics, and goals, not to mention threat and who is threatened.
2006-11-06 02:52:44 · answer #2 · answered by Tony C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well that would be acceptable when the Brits build up there forces to lead such an invasion until then your just back up.
2006-11-06 04:54:06 · answer #3 · answered by brian L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every modern incursion by the allied forces of UK and USA has been a joint one way back to the first Gulf War, so your question doesn't really make sense mate. We all went in together!
2006-11-06 02:44:42 · answer #4 · answered by camshy0078 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets just sit back and see how the americans get on first if they are loosing leave them to it
2006-11-06 02:52:29 · answer #5 · answered by colin050659 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why invade - let's buy them all off.
2006-11-06 02:46:29 · answer #6 · answered by Eve 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
britain should lead
DESTINATION USA
BLOW THE XXXXXX IN TO SPACE
2006-11-06 05:00:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Or how about Canada?
2006-11-06 02:39:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
my cat should
2006-11-06 02:38:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋