They do log the ip numbers of the people who report. They just don't care if the report is legitimate or not. If they let it be known who made the report then the reporting would slow way down. I think when you receive a violation it should have the id who complained about you. It's the American way. We should have the right to face our accuser.
2006-11-05 20:39:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Check this question out! It's a question about a webcam.
My answer was something like:
I dont know but for god sake put some trousers on!
They reported me for abuse! nice eh?
I think Yahoo Q&A should start logging the people who report all 'Abuse' and 'Violation' claims - then they would be able to identify those who are set on destroying Yahoo Q&A. - MESSAGE TO ABUSE REPORTER:report this for abuse and get your identity logged as a 'Yahoo Negative Poster' on YOUR records. You deserve it.
2006-11-05 23:16:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm fuming at mo, received another violation notice myself this morning, for nothing. All I did was reply to a question and some smart Alec decided it was'nt a question???? Halfwits or snobs some of em! mmmph!!!!
=kizzy=
I think Yahoo Q&A should start logging the people who report all 'Abuse' and 'Violation' claims - then they would be able to identify those who are set on destroying Yahoo Q&A. - MESSAGE TO ABUSE REPORTER:report this for abuse and get your identity logged as a 'Yahoo Negative Poster' on YOUR records. You deserve it.
2006-11-05 21:11:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kizzy_ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is the situation approximately YA that makes me mad. I quite often attempt to supply a sturdy answer and to be precise, giving internet references the place i will. Then some pillock comes alongside and needs to make their pathetic answer look sturdy and comments my sturdy (in my humble opinion!) answer for something stupid. What additionally makes me offended is that the violations are meant to be monitored. nicely in the event that they're they should have monkeys doing the monitoring! (think of im gonna get a violation observe for that?). yet actual, the gadget they have does no longer artwork. Im unsure with reference to the detrimental poster situation. that should actually artwork against the gadget. I record masees of abuse, I continually record unsolicited mail and merchandising (of which there's a lot!), I will additionally record racial abuse and private touch invites and email addys being given out. so which you would be able to guess I make quite greater than a number of information, yet they're honest and interior the policies of Yahoo. i do no longer record solutions which I evaluate greater suitable than mine ot those which I dont accept as true with as many do. i think of the gadget needs some severe overhauling extraordinarily in regard to teh persistant advertisers who bypass although many identity and you basically understand its the comparable individual coz the submit is be conscious for be conscious the comparable! Ive had my rant :D...Yahoo get your botty into kit and DO something!
2016-10-15 10:37:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm offended and now I'll report you!
Just kidding! I agree that some people are too easily ready to stomp on other people and the abuse of the reporting needs to stop.
2006-11-05 20:34:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by thezaylady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol i got reported enough this week from those losers *sob* :`[ lost too many points too..i really wish yahoo could take the reasons for reporting into more consideration
2006-11-05 20:34:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It shouldn't be necessary if Yahoo employed referees that could read!!!
2006-11-05 20:38:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's it, I'm reporting you! :)
2006-11-05 20:35:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sera B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
new here. seems there is alot of bashing going on.why? it,s beyond me !
2006-11-05 20:35:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by reseda1420 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh my god.. Poor u! seems like u get many complaints?
2006-11-05 20:46:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋