GW Bush is by far the most catastrophic president in American history. from the stolen 2000 election and his subsequent installment in the Whitehouse by his daddy's friends on the Supreme Court to his manipulation of intelligence info to lie our nation into a war for profit to his complete and utter failure before, during and after Katrine to his "stay the course" idiocy of his Middle Eastern Vietnam that rude, smirking inarticulate frat boy has committed so many crimes against our country and against the world it'd take me all night to list them. THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER! God help America! he's got 2 more years to do more damage to our Constitutional rights, our environment, our old and our poor, our military, Iraq and the world. the only ones benefiting from his misadministration are his "have and have mores" base including his war profiteering cronies who own big stock options in Big Oil, Halliburton and the Carlyle Group.
2006-11-05 17:17:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by nebtet 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nixon resigned in personal disgrace. Bush disgraced the whole country and so damaged the US's reputation abroad that it will take decades, if not lifetimes, to undo the damage to US prestige internationally.
Nixon actually had a pretty good environmental record. Many of the most important pieces of environmental legislation came under his watch. Bush is far and away the absolute worst envioronmental president ever. Much of the damage done under his leadership can never be undone.
2006-11-06 01:22:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Didgeridude 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nixon wasn't that bad actually. He just got a little greedy. For the sake of the question though yes.. No worth ethic, he was born with a silver spoon/
2006-11-06 01:04:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kevin Q 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
No. He is the worst president since before George Washington.
2006-11-06 01:03:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Safiyah 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
No,not since,ever.I don't believe we've ever been in a worse predicament financially,internationally,etc..Prez.Bush, it seems,thinks or likes to imagine himself being able to pee farther than DADDY.We,America,to my knowledge,have never initiated a pre-emptive strike on another nation.The big kahuna and his cohorts are reminiscent of schoolyard bullies.Shades of Genghis Khan,Alexander the Great,Roman 'Imperialism,Napoleon,HITLER.Or-----Maybe he just wants to finish the job for DADDY.
2006-11-06 01:26:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sweet Willy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nixon was horrible.
Bush is much worse.
Heck, Ray-gun and Bush I were horrible too.
Best economy in U.S. history - The Clinton economy. Second - Kennedy.
Want more money, vote democrat.
2006-11-06 01:06:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Daniel A 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
He's mediocre at best. History will judge him based on how the war turns out... and from the looks of things right now, that probably won't be very good.
2006-11-06 01:04:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by . 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes...
Things have been going downhill since he got in office...
If you think the COUNTRY is better off since he became president, you're delusional.
Bush has squandered all of the Clinton administration's surplus, and we're now in more debt than the country has ever been in...
WE HAVE TO BORROW MONEY FROM CHINA!!!
2006-11-06 01:05:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by RED MIST! 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
Nixon was a great president, and Bush is even better.
2006-11-06 01:04:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
he's far worse than nixon--nixon at least got elected legally and had the good grace to step down after he'd fud it all up
2006-11-06 01:02:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋