English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

There isn't one. No one tries to argue against non-embryonic stem cell research. Unfortunately, many people don't know there it exists. This is unfortunate because ALL successful stem cell research to date has involved non-embryonic stem cells. If most people understood that, the debate would go away.

2006-11-05 13:38:23 · answer #1 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1 0

The cell yield is lower than embryonic stem cells. I my opinion, non-embryonic is the way to go. No ethical issues. You aren't destroying products of human conception etc etc. No religious arguments.

2006-11-05 13:51:49 · answer #2 · answered by Labsci 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers