Because that's now where the market is, so they
don't put much quality in that section of the receiver.
Go to an electronics store or online and get a ampli-
fied antenna -and voila!
H a p p y
L i s t e n i n g !
2006-11-05 12:42:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I know that problem all too well. Unfortunately, most receivers have had less than stellar performing tuners for many years regardless of price unless the manufacturer decided to put some extra effort into the tuner section. I have only had one receiver that actually had a really good tuner on it. That was a NAD. My current ONKYO is quite good, but not like the NAD was. Your best bet is to use an outdoor antennae with the receiver. Many manufacturers (NAD, ONKYO, YAMAHA, SONY, KENWOOD, and many others) have recommended that for a long time. Your owners manual may say that same thing.
For example, I've been using "rabbit ear" style indoor antennas and have done good in my area. However, I have friends who are using outdoor rooftop antennas and are doing much better than I am. So, I would try an outdoor or attic antennae. That should solve much of the problem. BTW, does anybody else reading this know if there is such a thing as cable FM radio?
2006-11-05 13:05:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by davj61 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good reception depends on at least two factors: the signal and the receiver. Every radio receiver needs certain signal level to properly transfer radio waves into sound. Unfortunately the receiver is not just one small box. Each receiver needs antenna. Radio antenna is the only element that actually receives radio waves. Antenna is an essential part of every radio receiver. However, in many cases antenna is either integrated in the receiver or is attached to it. But the fact is that it is an essential part of radio receiver. The best place to install antenna is top of the house--roof. This place allows unobstructed reception of radio signals. In your case I assume you don't have roof top antenna. Radio waves propagate also into house (provided there are no metal walls). Unfortunately, each obstacle decreases signal level. This means that the signal inside the house will be significantly lower than outside. In addition to this all the furniture, walls and even your presence disturbs radio waves. As a consequence you have trouble receiving a station. The best solution would be to mount an outdoor antenna. This will ensure reliable reception in all cases. Of course, the radio needs appropriate antenna input. In the case outdoor antenna is not possible or the radio has no such input you need to experiment with its position or maybe you can try with indoor antenna. From your description it is evident that the signal level is low. You can not increase it but you can increase the signal level that comes to the radio receiver. This magic amplifier is good outdoor receiving antenna.
2016-05-22 02:21:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is likely that your receiver came with a separate am antenna - a plastic loop with a twisted pair of wires that attach to the back of the receiver. It is likely that there are electric currents in the vicinity of the antenna and it is picking them up. Tune to an am station and try to move the antenna around while listening to the sound. Try getting as far away from equipment and wires as possible. You should be able to reduce interference, but likely not eliminate it.
2006-11-08 08:16:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jim G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would be surprised how placement of the antenna or the reciever would make a difference. Also, the general area of your home may simply get bad reception. Plus you have a cheap reciever. Try some of the suggestions above.
2006-11-05 18:46:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Surge 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many home receivers have crappy tuners in them (especially AM). The problem is usually multi-path. Best solution is a roof top antenna or a receiver with a better tuner.
Careful with amplified antennas. They amplify the same lousy signal. If multi-path is your problem, amplified antennas won't help.
2006-11-05 12:44:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by shakopcool 3
·
0⤊
0⤋