i think there is a fine line between evolution and adaptation-they are not the same.Like when you move from a warm climate to a cold one, your blood thickens a little-that is an adaptation-not a new species of human. Just like the "urban parrots" in NYC. They shouldn't be a new species, they have adapted extremely well to their environment. i do not believe in evolution at all, it makes absolutely no sense...I think that God designed everything perfectly from beginning to end. no evolution just purposeful design.
2006-11-05 14:36:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by yellabanana77 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a tough subject to tackle!!!
So to attempt to answer this may not be the easiest.
I would like to remind you at this point that evolution is still a theory and unproven. But it does have great credibility. What does bring it down is this: we are using a dating system called carbon dating where we use the known half life of a radioactive carbon atom as a measure for how old things are (by their amount of radioactive decay). Without getting into details suffice to say we have only been able to implement this science for a very small amount of time compared to the time spans we are measuring. In other words there is no proof that this science is in fact accurate despite its ability to have measured things quite accurately in known human history. (carbon dating can measure up to millions of years in this theory).
So i would encourage everyoneto remember that while evolution is a very good scientific answer it is not perfect, and still a theory. Having said thet scientists also have been unable to create a living organism out of nothing. They have determined that they need specific amino acids to do this and the circumstances under which they created life would not hold for 'all' life. There is, therefore, no conclusion as to how living matter came to be. Until you introduce another factor, which is a Creator.
Intelligent Design does not directly say that htere was a Creator but it does show a certain lean towards something else affecting the way the universe is built. Christians believe that God is the responsible catalyst for all the scientific happenings at the beginning of time. This then is a theory with just as much credibility as evolution. With both sides having large scientific impacts and large truths.
Consider this: We will never prove that God exists by science or logic. Never. (Else God can be defined and is not limitless, or there is also no longer a point in believing). And we should never be able to determine how we came to exist without Gods interference, since this would mean that we would again have to prove that there was no divine interference ie no God. And we know that this is an impossibility since science cannot ever be a proof for or against the actual definitive existence of God. So I would recommend that we think about the answer as much as we like but never try to come to a sole conclusion because this would never be possible.
I hope this in some ways clears up what you are thinking. I do suggest you continue thinking about this because your insight may be appreciated by many :)
2006-11-05 10:53:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Is every person else ill of this question being asked ten cases an afternoon? a million. because of the fact it did no longer "basically look", it developed. you relatively ought to study up on the situation which you prefer to communicate. 2. because of the fact existence forming by using a organic technique makes a lot greater experience than does an invisible guy interior the sky who made each and every thing.. yet right here is the better area: i replaced into an atheist long until eventually now I even knew what evolution replaced into. i did no longer replace one with the different. edit: ah we are speaking of the great bang. i like while human beings "make sparkling" their question after many have already replied. back, comparable answer applies. organic tactics trump Invisible author any day.
2016-10-15 10:17:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Darwin considered the process of evolution to be a tool of God. He was a deeply religious man and is buried in Westminster Abbey.
The conflict between religion and evolution was trumped up by false religious leaders as a means to inflame followers, make them more easily bent towards evil ends and separated from their money.
Same kind as consort with male prostitutes and do hard drugs whilst preaching against same.
2006-11-05 10:34:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
I believe that the Creationist theory co-exists with the theory of evolution, and I do NOT believe that this fact in any way erodes or diminishes my belief in Jesus as the Son of God having sacrificed himself for my sins.
I think that radical creationists are eluding themselves by taking literally what in the Bible was written prosaically. Likewise, I think that Evolutionists or Darwinists, as some people refer to them, take their views to a radical extent also, completely excluding the idea of Creation.
Assume for a moment that both are true; is there not room in the mind for the idea that God did make everything as it stands; creation as well as setting evolution in motion, and the authors of the Bible just gave an abreviated version? Gave us what we needed to know, as it were?
Think about it.
2006-11-05 10:36:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Micro evolution is a fact...there is non-disputable evidence that supports it.
Macro evolution and everything beyond it is not a fact. There is no evidence whatsoever that supports macro evolution, stellar evolution, the big bang, etc.
The MOST logical explanation is that God created everything. If people think that matter created itself, they're more deluded than they realize.
2006-11-05 10:45:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by IL Padrino 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, you give me a little bit of hope. This only serves to prove that you can believe in God and still accept evolutionary theory.
I don't, however, like your insinuation that not believing in God means "living in sin". If you don't believe in a god, you're not "living in sin". Sin is a cultist concept and the only ones who are bound by it are those who accept it.
2006-11-05 10:32:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ummm.... Jesus was a man. God is the Christian creator. At least according to the bible.
As for the cell, study biology, chemistry, and physics and find out.
2006-11-05 10:35:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
you can't believe evolution within the species because in a period of 4k years there is no way you'll get all the different dogs and human races.
2006-11-05 10:53:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Alucard 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
How could Jesus be the creator? We were already around when he came on the scene.
Maybe you want to re-think this theory of yours a bit?
2006-11-05 10:36:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by eri 7
·
0⤊
2⤋