Already costs a person points for asking a question so I guess that is a surcharge of sorts. But as far as winning for answers I think a nice cash prize would be more appreciated than a date with a hottie. Sure lots of husbands and wifes may have a problem with their partner winning a date with a beauty from the opposite sex.
2006-11-05 07:17:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by crazylegs 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate to put a damper on your idea but: people wouldn't answer on Yahoo if they had to pay.
Anyone who was married or in a relationship would not be able to take the prize. Everyone has different concepts of 'gorgeous'. Would you want to be 'the prize' - who knows who or what you might end up dating?
2006-11-05 15:19:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by lianhua 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Then I would demand a far better oversight than I am getting now
2006-11-05 15:17:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
am sure they have thought of it but didn't need your pea brain to encourage them on. Obviously another suggestion from someone with more money than brains.
2006-11-05 15:19:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by nidan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
if that was the case i would not participate as im on the social unemployed and cant afford to pay
2006-11-05 15:52:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No its better this way no one would do it if you had to pay
not a good idea
2006-11-05 15:17:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cornelia Anabelle Banana Bo Peep 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What happened to freedom of speech ???
2006-11-05 15:17:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dragon Empress 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say, haven't you bought your fireworks yet?
2006-11-05 15:16:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Goofy Goofer Goof Goof Goof ! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
as long as it was only 1p a question!!
2006-11-05 15:16:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by confused 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree.
Best the way it is.
2006-11-05 15:22:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by suzy c 5
·
0⤊
0⤋