Picasso was a doer not a thinker to me. I think some of his art and pottery toward s the end was just to make himself happy and he didn't really care what critics thought.
2006-11-05 06:34:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by ????? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can learn about different ways of seeing the world. A lot of his art was really about presenting the subject as it is really seen by people. You see with your eyes like a photograph, but there are other things at play, like your collected knowledge, emotional attachment, past memories of seeing the same thing, all different points of view, etc. For example, a baby would have a very different view of its mother than an adult would. Most of Picasso's art was a representation of the subject from more points of view (physical and otherwise) than a camera could capture. So it could sort of be where extreme abstraction and extreme realism meet.
2006-11-05 14:40:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by tamesbadger 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To embrace life wholeheartedly, to not be swayed by what anyone else might think of or say about you, to push, explore and express your creativity beyond what you imagine its possible limits to be, to never lose touch with your inner child.
2006-11-05 19:32:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by pat z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally I've learned nothing from the dude.
2006-11-05 14:21:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by dumpsterdd90 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the most simple things can be gleaned from any observation of any of the classics.
brushstrokes my dear brushstrokes
2006-11-05 14:39:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ___ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a whole lot. At least in my opinion.
2006-11-08 15:40:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by mikeae 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
how you can be an old bald fat man in a speedo and score hot babes.
2006-11-05 14:28:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋