Would R&S be better if they broke it down into subcatagories?

Question

Would you like it if Yahoo Answers was to break down R&S into different religions.

Then a person could ask questions expecting to get answers based on who their asking. Plus you'd get better answers to look through instead of half dumb and half smart answers.

But where would they put atheist because they don't believe in anything. I guess they could have one called nonbelievers even though that doesn't really make sense.

Answer 1

People would still go where they want, then they would be saying,
"get outta my subcatagory!"

Answer 2

while i replaced into sixteen i had a poor breakdown from taking too plenty L.S.D and Extacy. I did scream and cry right into a pillow and then hospitalized for 6 months. i replaced into prescribed Largactil 300mg two times on a daily basis yet i ought to particularly circulate and have been given the "Largactil shuffle". yet then i found a treatment 2 years later: Opium no longer basically did it end those poor thoughts and concepts it relatively made me satisfied. i'm now thirteen years in a while Methadone script and function been for over 10 years 150ml on a daily basis and that i stay in a 2 mattress room flat that replaced into presented by skill of the council so i do no longer pay any employ. I additionally recieve £a hundred and forty:00 each week from the social protection thats approximately $280 and that i'm getting unfastened wellness care because of the fact i stay interior the U.ok and we've a countrywide wellness service. So i do no longer pay for shrinks,counsellors,medical doctors,professionals and prescriptions. So all in all its became out o.ok.i in basic terms pay a water and an electric energy bill,oh and Sky Plus.

Answer 3

It might be a good idea for them to create a category for the dogmatic believers to talk among themselves, and then rigidly enforce a "no disagreement" policy there. Then they could ban those responses from the regular R&S area (e.g., the "then why are there still monkeys?", "you're going to hell", Pascal's Wager and so on responses would be violations).

Then those of us who are genuinely interested in discussing religion and spirituality could talk about it without all of the nonsense from the dogmatics, and they could talk among themselves without having to listen to disagreement.

Answer 4

No, I like having everybody together.

Just a big family -- the members squabble, but where would we be without each other? How could I *disbelieve* if there were no believers?

: )

Now, the damn violations -- that's a change I'd support gladly.

.

Answer 5

I doubt it, yahoo chat is broken down like that, and I quit going there because it's worse than in here.