If you don't believe in evolution, why won't you refuse vaccines?

Question

They're based on evolutionary principles.

Put your money where your mouth is!

http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/bull.html

For black mule - Poor examples to "prove" (non biological) things evolve. Millenia ago there were traders, then outposts, then the village square, then the town center, then the shopping mall.

The evolution of drug resistance in bacteria is one of the simplest examples of evolution that we have. It is extremely relevant to medicine. And since it is a case of microevolution, it is an example that should be widely embraced. Yet many people profoundly misunderstand drug resistance. Even news reports from the BBC have gotten it wrong.
Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is an evolutionary phenomenon:

heavy use of antibiotics selects bacteria that are genetically resistant to the drug
with continued use of antibiotics, those resistant forms of the bacteria multiply and spread to other hosts
eventually, resistant bacteria replace the population of once-sensitive bacteria.

And...just CLICK the link if you don't understand the basics of this. I'm curious as to WHY you won't refuse vaccines. The fact that they're evolutionarily based isn't really refutable.

Answer 1

You're asking them to apply sound reason and logic-it's beyond their capabilities. Immunisation entails the biological EVOLUTION of microbes so they can't ever say that it doesnt occur.

Answer 2

it particularly is genuine that flu virus mutating for all time. regardless of if, you have puzzled the words mutation and evolution. Mutation (changing of gene base pair) might deliver forth evolution (changing of a species), regardless of if that's no longer the only way. Mutation might additionally deliver forth optimal cancers, and we don't call that evolution. Flu, no longer undergo in concepts how in lots of circumstances it evolves, it maintains to be a flu virus. It won't evolve into some element else, because of the reality in accordance to the regulation of organic and organic determination, it extra healthful the survival of the virus. So, it does no longer evolve. Or ought to I say, it won't evolve. interior the ever changing envirnoment, version is important, virus adapt the envirnoment by skill of way of fixing its gene codes, which isn't a complicated component for it to do, you're arranged to comprehend. as long because of the reality the needed genes are no further affected. the a number of element is, do people particularly have self belief what we scientists upward thrust up. there is diverse hype approximately genetically replaced nutrition. you're arranged to comprehend that too. diverse people oppose the triple vaccines in this u . s ., even the ex-ultimate minister did no longer enable his infant to be vaccined with that. So, that's no longer something approximately faith good right here. regardless of if, it seems that persons have extra faith in God than scientists! As Christian, each little element created by skill of way of God is bodily valuable, so we use them with faith. As scientist, we could constantly no longer be leaping on a bang wagon until ultimately now we are incredibly specific on the undertaking of the nice and snug techniques, particularly from a money-grabbing pharmaceutical company.

Answer 3

Sorry, but they are not. Vaccines use disabled/inactive/dormant viruses to get the appropriate T cells in the body to help kill the real viruses if you are exposed.

If you are mentioning about the flu vaccine that you have to get each year do to different strains of the virus, they are simple mutations generally resulting in a loss of information. These mutations do not prove evolution as there is not a net gain of information. Evolution is a mouse changing into a cat.

Edit: To address your assumption that antibiotics trigger mutations in the bacteria I refer you to this article.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/superbugs.asp
In summary, the bacteria that are resistant to the antibiotic were already present, but were not as able to compete with other bacteria. When we apply the antibiotic, the resistant bacteria now has a non-competitive environment to colonize.

Answer 4

It's funny one of the pioneers of vaccination Louis Pasteur had a branch of science called stereochemstry. He concluded that life can only come from life and not inorganic. He never believed in evolution.

Frenchman Louis Pasteur used vaccination to fight rabies and anthrax. He also proved that germs play a key role in causing disease. In 1882, Robert Koch identified the germ that causes tuberculosis, described by one historian as “the greatest killer disease of the nineteenth century.” About a year later, Koch identified the germ that causes cholera. Says Life magazine: “The work of Pasteur and Koch ushered in the science of microbiology and led to advances in immunology, sanitation and hygiene that have done more to increase the life span of humans than any other scientific advance of the past 1,000 years.”

Answer 5

Those two things are entirely non-related. I don't get vaccines because they don't work. If I get a vaccine against something, I am guaranteed to get whatever it was the vaccine was supposed to prevent. If I don't get the vaccine, I'm perfectly fine.

Answer 6

Evolution is ONLY and theory and not actual fact.

Why do you lay down a question that is absurd as vaccines and evolution.

Answer 7

Vaccines are developed by injecting dead cells of the virus into someone or something that produces antibodies against the virus.

That has nothing to do with evolution.

Answer 8

Yep, they're all hypocrites. 'God gave us vaccines - but I don't believe that evolution!' They don't know what they're talking about.

Edit: Oh, some of them think vaccines don't work either. Well, there's no reaching some people.

Answer 9

How do you figure? Explain....excuse me but dead virus cells are a far cry from human life...use a bit of common sense

Answer 10

Vaccines are a God given gift. And who says that God didn't create evolution?