Here we go again: throwing all the blame on Islam out of entire ignorance.
Look people, Islam FORBIDS FEMALE CIRCUMCISION. I'm Muslim, and because my parents know Islam really well, i have never ever been circumcised as Islam realizes how unfair it could be to a woman. Not only me, but billions of female Muslims never went under the knife too.
If God doesn't want a female to enjoy sex with her husband, he would have created her without a clitoris. Easy, right?
Female circumcision is due to the ignorant cultures of some societies and their retarded believes.
Quit bashing Islam for the sake of peace and do some good reading!
2006-11-05 03:24:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
While I don't approve of female circumcision, my understanding of the practice is that a circumcised female will not stray from her husband, because she has no sexual pleasure or desires. A man whose daughter already has had the procedure done will be more desirable to a potential husband because she can easily be controlled and manipulated. This procedure is usually practiced in Africa and is thought to be a "rite of passage" for all girls/women to go thru.
A woman who has not been circumcised has all the desires that women naturally have and will be harder to control by their husband.
I think that the practice of it is barbaric. My heart goes out to the little girl who was maimed for life by her own Father. Hopefully they'll put this monster away for life.
Have a lovely rest of the day.
2006-11-05 02:50:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Goblin g 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
It is the only part of a human that is just for pleasure. They fear it may make the female enjoy sex and become promiscuous. If done right it makes the clitoris so sensitive that sex actually hurts. They just don't think women should enjoy sex.
2006-11-05 02:48:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
They believe women have no right to pleasure during sex.They are barbaric monsters living in a time warp.There is one religion I know of that carry out this practise.
2006-11-05 04:02:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ollie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck, that's a practise that's been followed in parts of Islamic African Countries where they extended the circumsicion for men to the women and then justified the mutilation of the female genitalia to make it painful for the women to have sex and hence be "clean" of carnal thoughts!?
There are a lot of totally undesirable things being brought in USA which are going beyond the limits of human tolerance and I say we should start fighting back.
Islamic Groups said that they found "In God we Trust" offensive because, according to them, it glorified the Christian "God" . Today, they are trying to make it Politically Incorrect for "One Country under God" and "God Bless America", on the same grounds!?
Now, these people came here whining and begging for refuge and now repay us like this!?
A lot of Muslims were seen "celebrating" 9/11!? And the murder of the Cartoonist which they aired in al-Jazeera!?
Well, they're laughing from the other end, nowadays! Because people are finding reasons why they won't do business with Muslims here. People are finding it uncomfortable to keep Muslims among their Staff. And they will find it very difficult to get a work permit or an extension to their visas now.
So, you see, it's not all that bad here, now.
2006-11-05 03:05:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
The man was an immigrant from Ethiopia. It is a native practice there.
2006-11-05 02:47:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
That's an evil thing to do. God gave women a clitoris so they could share in sexual pleasure with their husbands. To rob them of that is evil and against God's will.
2006-11-05 02:46:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by STEPHEN J 4
·
8⤊
0⤋
Same reason they circumcise males, it reduces the pleasure obtained via sex and self-stimulation which they frown upon.
Of course the male version includes delusions of improved sexual health. In reality, there's no difference, it's still mutilation done at the child's expense and, even in medical use, should be avoided in favour of alternative methods.
2006-11-05 02:52:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Omg. That was horrible. Made me flinch just reading it.
2006-11-05 02:52:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Please! 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
utter Paganism, it is against the creative love of God and to be challenged by all right minded people.
2006-11-05 02:46:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
4⤊
0⤋