English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Attention!
In compliance with state law and several court rulings, this textbook contains only information favorable to the theory of evolution. In compliance with court rulings and due to threat of lawsuit by the ACLU no books contrary to the theory of evolution are allowed in the school library. In compliance with court rulings teachers who present any information that disparages or refutes the theory of evolution may be suspended, disciplined or terminated from their position (please contact the principle if this occurs).
A judge has ruled that evolution is science and therefore cannot be questioned or examined critically, as such we cannot and will not teach or present any information that does not support, uphold or defend evolution, a legally established science.

2006-11-05 01:15:47 · 14 answers · asked by miknave 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I hope people commenting negativly realize that I’m drawing from actual events for my proposed sticker. Judges have ruled that having any factual information that is contrary to evolution available to schoolchildren in public schools is illegals. And that teachers have been disciplined or fired for speaking against evolution.

2006-11-05 05:05:59 · update #1

I hope people commenting negativly realize that I’m drawing from actual events for my proposed sticker. Judges have ruled that having any factual information that is contrary to evolution available to schoolchildren in public schools is illegal. And that teachers have been disciplined or fired for speaking against evolution.

2006-11-05 05:07:01 · update #2

14 answers

Only in America do people have to be constantly reminded that religious stories are just fairy tales, and are not to be taken seriously. The rest of the civilized world figured that out several centuries ago.

2006-11-05 01:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by stevewbcanada 6 · 2 3

ABSURD!

The state shall make no law to promote any religion. It does not mean it has the right to protect those that do not believe from those that do. Atheism just as much a religion, as is any group that proclaims to be one.

Creationism is a religious belief based on ones faith or belief, evolution is a provable scientific fact which can be held in your had. Evolution and creation can and do co-exist and neither can be diminished. It is up to the state (if we have given it that power) to teach only provable facts and not faith based beliefs. Neither is a threat to the other if they are both taught in their respective environments.

I also believe that religion (all) have merit and should be mentioned in history classes to show their influences on our society.

2006-11-05 01:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by Joanie 5 · 3 0

What disclaimer stickers? Im starting up college back in some months and mark my words if there is something with regards to non secular dissuasion you'll study me contained in the information from AZ.

2016-11-28 19:25:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

To pointed. More General.

"Please note, what is contained in this book applies only to the year it was written, plus not all scientists may agree on a given point of view. The views, opinions, theories and facts are contained herein are subject to change, deletion or amendment at some future date without notice whenever Science or a committee of scientists decides it was wrong about something. Take nothing contained herein to be written in stone, for tomorrow we may change our minds. Just ask your teachers as we taught them there were 9 planets and Pluto was one of them, but we will teach you differently this time around, unless, of course, this science book is old and outdated, in which case disregard the Astronomy section in whole or part!"

2006-11-05 01:26:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not good, because science is a continual process of questioning the validity of ideas based on evidence and probabilities. Any scientific postulation can be challenged by the presentation of new FACTS and amended or discarded where warrented. What you want is the right to present an alternative set of unsubstantiated beliefs to challenge what is the best supported current understanding of reality with your delusionally derived, superstitious based pile of total crap called "Intelligent Design". Get a brain.

2006-11-05 01:35:34 · answer #5 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 2 2

I would have included.

Warning. The theory of evolution rests on a set of presuppositions based on philosophical materialism and is from a humanist viewpoint hostile to other world views.

Warning. Nothing in medicine, agriculture or technology rests on the theory of evolution, it's prine purpose and to make aetheism possible

Warning this is anot an example of "Go where the data leads" this is an example of leading children away from God
see Richard Lewanthon "we cannot let a divine foot in the door'

2006-11-05 01:28:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Sounds more like the establishment of a religion to me!

2006-11-05 03:12:41 · answer #7 · answered by claypigeon 4 · 1 0

Seems a bit long winded.

It could be shortened to say.

We have chose to teach evolution because it is the most plausible theory to date. Feel free to go to church for biblical interpretations.

Love and blessings Don

2006-11-05 01:27:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

baloney as all viewpoints need to be examined or otherwise there are limits being put upon the educational system which need not be there.

2006-11-05 01:25:54 · answer #9 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 2 0

I think someone was horribly bugged about God creating humans.

As it is, it makes sense for chemicals to do so ^^

Whatever that means..

2006-11-05 01:26:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers