English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Both.

2006-11-04 23:37:53 · answer #1 · answered by tracethelostboy 2 · 1 0

The goal is noble-to stop the terrorists from spreading for their benefit as well as ours, but the means aren't adequate. The Islam radicals mean to take over the whole world so why are our guys & trainees fighting them and not the rest of the countries as they are threatened too. GWB should have recruited help from all countries and those who don't, we don't help them if they get terrorists. Now even the military leaders want Rumsfeld fired for covering up the real intensity in Iraq & not providing ample support for victory-I wish they would put him over there with the soldiers and let him sweat it out. Bush is wrong to keep Rums, his bud, against our troops advise That shouldn't be allowed for him to just keep someone inept b/c he's his pal.Actually the both of them have messed up too much with our troops at stake & making us look incapable. Somebody with a real plan better get in charge real soon as the terrorists are in over 40 states already enjoying their US rights.(btw,I'm not either party right now).

2006-11-05 00:50:47 · answer #2 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0 0

The Sunni Arabs are getting out of Iraq because the Kurd and Shia, especially the Shia, death squads are operating more frequently in formerly "safe" Sunni Arab areas. Anbar province (western Iraq) is becoming particularly active, and the government has told tribal leaders out there to either do something to reduce the terrorist attacks launched from bases in Anbar, or face escalating attention from death squads

2006-11-04 23:52:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Pulling out will probably end up with Pres. Bush being spanked by his daddy and his weapon industry friends.
Anyway the biggest amount of terrorist are not really in Iraq but on the other side of the world.

2006-11-05 08:42:37 · answer #4 · answered by remi 2 · 0 0

It is technically both. Some are patriots and want us off their turf, but they use acts of terrorism that just makes them bad people. Others just get the jollies from killing civilians and join radical groups to do it. They think they are doing everything for God, although God surely doesn't like the killings of innocent civilians. The patriots get dragged into doing terror because they might be threatened that if they don 't they could get killed, or something, because I have heard about how a lot of terrorists were working for Al-Zarqawi and they didn't like his killing of Civilians and people of the same religion, but he shut those people up, and then one of those people could have potentially betrayed Zarqawi and that could have lead to his death. Not everyone we are fighting is bad to the bone, some are patriots forced to do bad things, and others just hate the world.

2006-11-05 00:44:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We still have terrorists from IRAN , SYRIA, SAUDI , JORDAN , AFGANISTAN , PAKISTAN , CHECHNIA , EGYPT , all over the world . Even Brits and Americans have shown up on the other side .
The Iraqi's are mainly fighting each other over control of the country and politics .

2006-11-05 00:22:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i visit purpose that might actually assist you..... we are scuffling with a conflict in Iraq. In conflict, human beings die and issues get broken. we try complicated to no longer kill harmless human beings or harm substantial infrastructure, regardless of if it happens. it relatively is called collateral harm. conflict right here might kill greater human beings and destry greater American infrastructure. it relatively is incorrect to think of that terrorists might stand out right here. The 9/11 terrorists did no longer placed on signs and indicators that suggested, "examine out me, i'm a terrorist." they gained't stand out right here to any extent further than you or me. As for the dying toll, each time youngsters die it relatively is undesirable, it hurts familes, communities; it impacts families constantly. And it happens daily, assorted cases an afternoon, all in the time of this u . s . a . in numbers a techniques greater suitable than in Iraq. i understand way too a lot approximately this situation to be introduced to job for my comments, yet i'm specific i visit..... we've continually had as a coverage that scuffling with in another country is larger than scuffling with right here because of the fact we've seen the devastation conflict brings. we are all a techniques greater suitable off for it.

2016-10-15 09:51:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No there are no terrosist in Iraq,Osama and all his friends got away(not that there ever there) while we were getting rid of Saddam Hussian for him.Do people really believe that Osama approved of a despot like Hussian we have done him a favour.

2006-11-05 01:15:51 · answer #8 · answered by molly 7 · 0 0

Guys who want you off their turf of course. Is terrorists a new reason now? because first it was nukes, then Saddam, when did it change into fighting terrorists... Sorry, my info seems outdated.

2006-11-04 23:39:35 · answer #9 · answered by rinah 6 · 0 3

We're still definitely fighting terrorists, no question.

2006-11-05 01:25:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you know, i think its funny that you said, are we still fighting terrorists in iraq, because it seems to me that the us is the terrorists, i mean yeah we are over there killing people on their turf. but i couldnt tell you why we are over there now, maybe like the korean war and vietnam war we are just over there so we just shove mc donalds down their throat and make money off it

2006-11-04 23:42:37 · answer #11 · answered by singmelies 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers