She just gave birth 5 days ago and she has a 2 year lease with 14 months left in the lease ....but it is an Adult building No kids or smoking allowed but pets are allowed which is good but do they have a right to kick her out of her condo ....And what are her rights
2006-11-04 23:35:31 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Other - Pregnancy & Parenting
It is a terrible time for this,but unfortunately she signed the papers,knew the rules going in and they are perfectly within their rights.It would be similar to relaxing the standards on an age appropriate housing and letting in a 18 yr old to a retirement place.You do it for one,others expect it.Help her formulate a plan to get to a new place and offer lots of support.
2006-11-04 23:45:46 · answer #1 · answered by maykithapin 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends a LOT on how the lease is worded. If she has broken the lease agreement, they do have a right to evict her, however there are probably stipulations about time they must allow her to find a suitable place. I would think concessions could/would be made for a woman and infant, but hey - she knew when she signed the lease that there were no children allowed in the building (which seems extremely odd to me -- what country do you live in?)
2006-11-04 23:41:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If she signed the lease, she's pretty much out of luck.
Essentially, the question comes down to "If someone violates a contract
what are her rights"? If it doesn't specifically say what they will do under
that situation, then there probably isn't any remedy - its up to the landlord
and clearly the landlord doesn't want to have children there.
Why did she sign the lease if she was going to have children?
Tell me - all of the other people who rent (or own) these condos who
do so BECAUSE there will be no children there - who do they sue when
the landlord lets one in?
2006-11-04 23:39:23 · answer #3 · answered by Elana 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She needs to look at her lease. If it said no children in building, then she must go. If it didn't say anything about children or no children, then she needs to hire a lawyer and take the matter to court. If it is an adult building, I am pretty sure that she signed a lease that had a no children permitted rule.
2006-11-05 00:24:03 · answer #4 · answered by Scarlett28 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most likely they can ask her to leave...if it does say now children....
but if I were her, I would tell them that she will leave when the lease is up and not before, if they push it ..tell them that she will have to hire an attorney and it may just get messy, and by the time it is solved, she would be in a new place with a law suit against the old building for discrimination and all kinds of other charges...
so it is in their best interest to just let her run out the rest of the 14 months and she will leave quietly..
but why not just sue them now for the fun of it and maybe some extra cash..maybe sh can buy a house when she is done suing them..
good luck
2006-11-06 07:28:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would depend on whether or not she had talked to her property manager about getting out of her lease and tried to find other housing earlier. There must be a clause for this type of think. They can't evict her as well as fine her for lease breaking for getting pregnant.
She should sit down with them and read the fine print if she hasn't already.
2006-11-05 01:38:47 · answer #6 · answered by Emily O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the lease she signed specifically stated that no children are allowed and if you end up having children you'd be evicted, than yes, they do have that right. People who moved there wanted to be in a child free environment - that's their right to keep it that way.
2006-11-05 00:01:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
she did sign the list hope she had read it
she can always consol a lawyer but I am not sure that she will win she might do better by using the situation at her advantage
by making some sort of dealt with the assosiation
because I am sure they will prefer not to have the publicity
Good luck to her
& remember she agreed with the lease she is the one who broke it
2006-11-04 23:53:03 · answer #8 · answered by waiting for baby 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She cannot be evicted for getting pregnant,though when the child is born she can.If it says in the lease "No Kids".
The Kid has to be born to be a "Kid" for them to evict her.Also I think even when she has the baby/kid they have to give her time to relocate,find another home.I believe there is a law that protects her even after she gives birth.
2006-11-04 23:42:50 · answer #9 · answered by chadworkz 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
by using fact the tenant, you're to blame on your travelers. regardless of the shown fact that, what are the 300 funds for? Did your targeted visitor or his cats carry out a little type of injury? If the damages are valid and are the direct effect of your targeted visitor's negligence, then sure you are going to be evicted in case you do no longer pay the 300 funds. regardless of the shown fact that, once you think approximately notification standards and think of roughly criminal courtroom cases to acquire an order of eviction, you have a minimum of 30 days to return up with the 300 funds. initiate searching for yet another place jointly as your credit continues to be good.
2016-12-28 13:21:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋