You know by looking at my rating I have half a brain I spend half my time laughing at the spelling, questions and ohhh God these answers, enough to know why American is in trouble. However, you are one of the true intelligent ones. I will beat you are not American, are you? I agree and if you want to hang Saddam for killing 300,000 Iraqi what do you want to do to someone who has killed 600,000 along with 2700+ Americans.
"Retired Army War College prof. and CIA analyst (6 years) answers questions ranging from the gassing of the Kurds in Halabja [Iraq was not responsible, nor was it genocide by the Iranians], to Israel's push for war on Iraq; and the "chief enemy of the peace movement, the media."
Americans believe what the want, you're a racist if you love the Confederacy or its flag, Saddam did this or that. The CIA reports that Saddam did not gas the Kurds! If you do not believe that file a Freedom of Information Request, see FOIA site below it fills out the request for you (I did -he didn't). But see for your self!
God Bless You and The Southern People.
2006-11-05 02:27:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because there's no such position as us of a. i do not recommend that that is fictional. There are borders and guidelines and all that. in spite of the indisputable fact that the everyone is so heterogenous that there's no genuine experience of community. community can deliver genuine regulations and annoyances, with acquaintances minding each and each and every others' organisation, in spite of the indisputable fact that it also brings duty. everyone is conventional with what everyone else is doing. i'm not saying multiculturalism is a nasty component, particularly the opposite. yet in case you couple that with the ravages of commercial capitalism, plus a heritage of valuing the myth of the rugged human being, you get a rustic the position human beings: a million. For the most area seem to imagine that each and each and every human being has the right to do as he or she pleases 2. Have a regulation (2d change) that guarantees their correct to undergo hands 3. go on defense force adventures in yet another u . s . a . a lot and are available decrease back with a subculture of gun use 4. Have lost their moral compass: few moral absolutes are difficulty-loose (like: do not shoot human beings). 5. do not comprehend or believe their acquaintances 6. many times have low self esteem and very much of pressure from the famous artwork (or non-artwork) international. that is quite a lot a marvel there are not more effective deaths given all that.
2016-11-28 19:21:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by gagliano 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, but he is getting what he deserves. You think he should live and be freed? What is your problem? HE is the cause of all the violence. It is not only America, it is a lot of other countries, and peoples who want this to happen. You have to be joking though right? And by the way, America is not in charge of the trial, it is the THEIR trial, and they are in charge. His country tried him, convicted him, and THEY will kill him. How could you even want that man to be set free? you like mass murderers?
2006-11-04 23:38:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by gin 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope you're joking. "The only guy who could end all the violence in Iraq".....??? He was the CAUSE of all of the violence! How can you possibly think someone like Saddam Hussein deserves to live? And how can you possibly think that America loves to send their children to die in war?
2006-11-04 22:32:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
You make it sound like he was tried in New York City? We (US) didn't convict him. His own court system did. We are going to hang him either. We don't love war any more than anyone else. I've been to Iraq, they are a violent people with violent ways. He is getting what his own countrymen have decided was right. BTW what country are you from that has a perfect system without war?
2006-11-04 23:13:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Guy who could end all the violence in iraq?! Who you mean? Saddam? He is responsable for all violence there - he killed many people, and you say he could end it? You are crazy
2006-11-04 22:34:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
hmmmm, tried and convicted in an Iraq court, by and Iraq judge, by the Iraq constitution and laws,,,,,,
is America happy, maybe not,
could he stop the violence, by imposing more violence.
America is not the country carrying out the sentence, it is Iraq that is doing that, so ... hmmm.
no Americans don't love war, but, we finish it when it comes to us.
2006-11-05 01:47:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by mhp_wizo_93_418 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
America is not putting him to death. The Iraqis are.
He was tried, convicted, and sentenced in an IRAQI court -- not an American one. His trial, conviction, and sentence had nothing to do with us.
Inform yourself a bit better, before starting the anti-American kick.
2006-11-05 01:34:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I suppose you would have said the same about Hitler had he survived. This trial is the mere tip of the iceberg compared with the hundreds of thousands of deaths he caused during his reign of terror. How on earth could he be allowed to continue.......
2006-11-04 22:34:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by thomasrobinsonantonio 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
As he was the main reason Bush (and Blair) wanted to go into Iraq in the first place, then maybe they can throw a party after the 'verdict' on some nearby aircraft carrier for "mission accomplished"....... but wait... didn't we do that one already....?
2006-11-04 22:35:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bart S 7
·
0⤊
3⤋