Man am I curious, I'll accept well thought out and consturctive supporting aruguments only.. One suggestion maybe you should read excerpts from the Bush Doctrine before answering
2006-11-04 21:38:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
some people amaze me .Its a long known fact that Saddam only got the power he had by being helped by the US , its also a long known fact that the weapons he had which he used to attack Kuwait and also to kill his own people were sold to him by the US and Europe Its another fact that the nuclear knowledge Iraq had was given by those i`ve already mentioned If the Kurds hadn`t stood up against Saddam which they only did because America gave them the impression they were going to join in and help them (which they had no intention of doing )they wouldn`t have been slaughtered for their punishment Iraqi`s didn`t ask for their country to be destroyed, news programs on TV have interviewed countless Iraqi`s who say how much worse it is now than with Saddam The threat to America came because of decades of interference in the middle east . According to international law the Iraq invasion is illegal and an act of hostility
2006-11-05 11:21:55 · answer #1 · answered by keny 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Assuming you mean 911 and not just the Iraq war, as far as i am concerned there are very many question that have not been answered. example:the head of ROLLS ROYCE said he had never seen the type of engine part that was found at the pentagon which was meant to be a rolls royce engine for the Boeing plane. Then there is the structural question posed through this reconstruction on youtube.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qJ11i6fi7KQ
2006-11-05 05:59:07 · answer #2 · answered by ??? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no doubt that the USA started the Iraqi war. The big question is...is the outcome worth the lives of our soldiers, especially since things are worse now than when we "liberated Iraq". I supported president Bush when this thing started, but now I just want to see the Armed Forces back home. However, I feel that Saddam must be dead or thoses fools over there might put him back in power & he WAS an evil man!
2006-11-05 05:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by Edward J 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
America started war in Iraq to get Iraqi oil. They miscalculated the whole thing very badly.
Bush with his pea-sized brain thought that it would be an easy thing to do. America would be rich with Iraqi oil after Saddam would be replaced by a pro-American puppet installed in Bagdad.
Bush and co did not foresee the fight that the Iraqis will put up to keep their country free of American inteference.
2006-11-05 06:04:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I personally believe that we did what we had to. Hussein was a long-time threat that had to be eliminated. Maybe there wasn't a real reason for going in there (in regards to 9/11), but it was something that had to be done eventually. I wish there was a time machine, in which we could all see what the world would be like right now had we not gone into the middle East. It could be better, but we could also have been attacked again, this time by Hussein. We will never know. It's better to get rid of the threat before he becomes yet another attacker of the American people.
2006-11-05 06:39:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
It appears that only the Evangelical Christian are in the dark about this. When their leaders are out doing meth with gay prostitutes, that could explain why they are uninformed about the cause of the war. Bush is an advocate of the "big lie," and he has helped with this ignorance pretending to be a Christian, pretending to be shocked by the Arabs on the street when his family has been in business with the Elite Arabs for decades. The story told to the public by corporate owned media is a lie. This lie has been told for such a long time, going farther back than the Third Reich, that people believe it to be historical fact. All these factors lead us to today and your question. How is this possible?
2006-11-05 05:41:03 · answer #6 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think we all know who started it. It's WHY that many people are questioning. What's BushCo's "excuse of the week"?
Saddam has ties to al-Qaida(sp?)? Nope.
Saddam caused 9/11? Nope.
Saddam has WMDs? Nope.
We are "liberating" Iraq? By occupying it for 4 years and turning its infrastructure to rubble.
With the election coming, maybe BushCo will come up with something creative in the next few day...
2006-11-05 05:46:33 · answer #7 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Well, lets see...Sadaam invaded Kuwait, we kicked him out.
He signed a surrender that included certain restrictions.
He repeatedly violated that agreement.
We went back and are finishing the job.
2006-11-05 05:47:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I don't need to read what you suggest, I am Australian, (and proud of it), the U.S.A. "DID NOT START THE WAR", obviously this is contrary to your belief.
2006-11-05 05:49:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
ME. The idiots that hit the Towers started it.
2006-11-05 05:44:42 · answer #10 · answered by Countrygirl 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋