Should cities, states, and counties be prohibited from addressing illegal immigration?

Question

The city ordinances regarding illegal aliens in Pennsylvania have been challenged by a rights group, and the court has suspended them. What's your opinion, is immigration enforcement solely something for the federal govt., or can/should local government get involved?

Answer 1

It should be left to the federal government.
Immigration issues (legal or otherwise) are a federal matter and should be left as such.

Answer 2

Just another blatant example of a judicial system gone awry. They did the same thing in California in 1994 when voters passed prop 187. The will of the people subverted by one judge.

The city ordinances in Pennsylvania are clearly in concert with federal law. A city can pass any ordinance that it wants as long as it does not conflict with federal law.

It is the duty of local government to enforce federal law. Federal Laws are enforced every day by local law enforcement with the exception of immigration laws. Most cities have non enforcement policies in that regard. THOSE are the policies that should be challenged in court. Judges should be suspending those policies not enforcement policies

Where are the judges when cities declare themselves sanctuary. This is anarchy. This is in total defiance of Federal law. Where is the ACLU? It is only a human right to break the law but it is not a human right to have a law enforced?

I say the people of PA should tell that judge to go F*** himself and enforce their ordinance

Answer 3

In my opinion the laws are on the books and they should be able to enforce them. They didn't re-write the laws or make up new ones. Whoever has the right to enforce the law should be held responsible. I feel charges should be filed against those in power who won't inforce them. Like sanctuary cities. I can understand if they were upset if all their people and resources were targeting one thing.....but to ignore it when it's so tightly connected is crazy. What the pro-illegal side seems to want is to just ignore all illegals no matter what additional crimes they are committing. They're crying "racism" for everything from driving without a license, to blatent disregard for housing codes to sound ordinances and anything the rest of us have to abide by. They don't catch an equal amout of people breaking each law because most of us know NOT to do that.

Answer 4

The Answer To THIS Question
(As With Many) Is This

MONEY TALKS


Its Up To The TAXPAYING VOTERS

We Pay LOCAL, STATE, And FEDERAL Taxes

As Residents Of The STATE, And State Taxpayers
The VOTERS Should Decide Whats Best
For The City, County, And State That They Live In




Choose (Elect) Your Representatives With Care

Answer 5

No ,a lot of states are doing what the federal government should be doing about illegal aliens.They are just trying to bring some sanity back to this nation.They are trying to protect their city's and states from being ravaged even more by the unchecked influx of an endless flow of illegal aliens.If the federal government wants to get involved then stop federal funding to the city's that have declared a so called"sanctuary" city. .Stop this affront to our nations laws against illegal aliens.I wonder if San Francisco would declare its self a sanctuary city for illegal aliens that are Asian,how quickly that would be pounced upon by the federal government?hmmm ? As long as city and state laws do not conflict with federal laws,I see nothing wrong with these city's and states trying to protect themselves from the onslaught of illegal aliens.I am not promoting any discrimination of any legal Americans,who have the right to live any where they can pass the credit check for,but only the rights of these city's and states not to rent to or provide aid to illegal aliens.

Answer 6

I think the judges who stop the ordinances are corrupt and partisan. The laws for enforcing immigration do not contradict federal law, state law, or the constitution in any way, so they cannot legally abolish them. Those judges screwed us over because they had their pockets lined with cash by illegals.

Answer 7

While I don't pretend to know anything about law, I feel that individual cities and states should be able to make their own laws regarding illegal immigration because this issue may affect some cities and states more than others as illegal immigrants seem to tend to flock more to certain areas than others and so those cities and states will be more affected than others in regards to their costs to schools, hospitals, social services, etc.

Answer 8

Since the President is unwilling to control the borders - people have to stand up and take mattes into their own hands at local levels as it's the ONLY way this problem will be fixed - I don't want to have to pay higher taxes to fund this secret invasion that is going on.

Answer 9

Ye they're preventable crimes, because of the fact if our regulations have been totally enforced, look what share lives could be spared and people who does no longer grow to be sufferers like those at VOIAC or humancost. I relatively have an entire record of them if mandatory. while all are seen on a query, they must be violated for cheating. yet yahoo enables this to bypass on.

Answer 10

I agree wit Bob G , Hazelton needs to fight to protect its legal citizens from the criminal element which has terrorized the citizenry. This legal battle should prove to be most interesting.

Answer 11

Possibly