-a funny semantic game is played when Christians talk about evolution. They claim that evolution is also a faith in something that does not have any proof. The truth is that there is sufficient evidence to at least see evolution as very likely. They foolishly cling to the to the fact that evolution is just a theory, not scientific fact. The truth is that even the concept of “gravity” is also “just a theory.” It’s practically impossible to “prove” evolution as fact because you would need to find the remnants (corpses, dna samples) of an animal’s ancestry dating back hundreds and thousands generations. Why can’t more Christians realize that there are more pertinent things to do on this earth (as far as god’s will for us is concerned) that to attack earnest inquiry. Why can’t you believe in evolution and in god?
2006-11-04 16:37:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, no, no! Evolution is a theory, in the scientific meaning of 'theory'. A theory in science is actually a proven fact. Evolution has been profusely proved. About 97-98% of the scientists find it reasonable. Evidence has been found, too. It's very sad that some people are refusing to see the facts. It's very difficult to discuss with someone who sees something is red, and they still keep arguing it's yellow.
2006-11-04 16:43:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Evolution includes more effective than 2 mechanisms. To view contained in the context you've proposed, evolution might want to be considered as this: the continuous refinement of organic and organic existence in route of an optimal state of type to a given ecosystem. The refinement is executed by technique of mutation and organic decision, in spite of the indisputable fact that it really is bamboozled by technique of the replacing ecosystem, so as that no 'optimal state' can ever be executed. The earth periodically kills each and every thing and what survives has new protections and reward. considering that evolution is a quite heavy, complicated idea and seems to have take position by technique of itself, it isn't irrational to presume it became an theory or attempt with an meant purpose and result. If God did create evolution then sure, we can obviously see he's detached, and indiscriminate. His purpose is critical, and his playing-field is complicated. He has shown us that we are going to live to inform the tale if we follow certain guidelines. yet, people have superimposed their own guidelines and guidelines over nature now utilising the gadget of civilization. So, sure, God is a cruel God. we are a thanks to His end, not something more effective. international religions secure there is something more effective than this. they imagine we'd want to be something a lot more effective than a thanks to an end, and there might want to be actuality in this.
2016-11-28 19:14:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just wish they put that same amount of effort into analyzing other scientific topics for a change, not just the ones that go against the Bible.
2006-11-04 16:39:19 · answer #3 · answered by . 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looks like it's "evil"ution versus fun"dumb"entalism. And never the twain shall meet.
2006-11-04 16:48:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Couldent have put it better
2006-11-04 17:04:19 · answer #5 · answered by lil bit 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I DO BELIEVE IN BOTH
2006-11-04 17:09:58 · answer #6 · answered by joe r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are afraid.
2006-11-04 17:27:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋