Would YOU fight against the injustice to American citizens and those immigrants who followed our laws? Would you join an underground Resistance group to 'remove' illegals from the USA?
2006-11-04
16:12:38
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Lelani
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
dukalink - these are some of the definitions of 'remove' take your pick:
(from Dictionary.com)
3.to move or shift to another place or position; transfer: She removed the painting to another wall.
4.to put out; send away: to remove a tenant.
5.to dismiss or force from a position or office; discharge: They removed him for embezzling.
6.to take away, withdraw, or eliminate: to remove the threat of danger.
7.to get rid of; do away with; put an end to: to remove a stain; to remove the source of disease.
MIMI - I cannot answer anymore questions today (new here), but I appreciate you being so informative. I would like to have answered 'United We Stands' question, she is really mad and so am I. California is turning into a suburb of Mexico!! This cannot happen!!! ty
2006-11-04
16:22:45 ·
update #1
Many Americans are ready to take up arms. If some Americans don't have the iron will to do what has to be done, then they can sit on the porch and wring their hands while the strong, brave citizens who, like our ancestors, had to resort to drastic measures to MAKE, DEMAND our government abide by the Constitution they swore on oath to protect. By allowing illegals in our country they are FAILING American citizens. The Presidential Oath:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
With his hand on a Bible. This is what George W. Bush, Swore.
This is a simple Oath of just a few dozen words. Does swearing this Oath mean the same thing, that it meant during the dawn of this Nation when George Washington said these words?
2006-11-04
16:36:52 ·
update #2
Is this like swearing in a court of law, when you as a witness are asked. "Do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth?" and you answer "I do!" If not, whats the difference? In a court of law if you swear to tell the truth and do not, it is called PERJURY, a crime punishable by the LAW. But when you Swear to protect the Constitution, the Highest Law in the Land, and do not, what is that called?
I will fight, armed if necessary, to fight for the Constitutional rights of my countrymen and my family's future, my children's future, their heritage, THEIR RIGHTS!! If it takes WAR, so BE IT!!
2006-11-04
16:41:29 ·
update #3
tkquestion - There is more going on than what is seen on the surface. More Americans are joining The Resistance every day. We don't need lilly-livered cowards. 'nuff said.
2006-11-04
16:51:05 ·
update #4
an "underground resistance group" huh. What are you going to do, riot at the mall? And how do you propose to recognize an "illegal?" Or will you just drive around and shoot anyone who doesn't look like your Aunt Tilly?
Grow up.
2006-11-04 16:17:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by dognhorsemom 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
I don't know that rebellion would reach the extent that you are talking about here. Too many citizens are very busy with working and raising their families and most living from paycheck to paycheck and while they may be furious if this happens, I don't know that they would have the stamina to go to the extent that you are describing. I think I would like to see some kind of class action lawsuits happen where the government is sued big time for damages caused by illegal immigration. While I don't know enough about law and if this is even possible, I think this would be a very good idea. Such as whole cities or States suing the Federal government for not enforcing our immigration laws and suing for the social costs of the illegal immigrants. I am hoping that people will vote in the elections for representatives who seem clear that they want to deport the illegals, those who seem very clear that there will be no such thing as amnesty, and those who will definitely get the border wall built and increase border enforcement, regardless of the cost. People say, "But those things will cost BILLIONS of $!" However, the illegal immigrants NOW cost many BILLIONS OF $ per year and the amount only goes up and up as more hospitals are closed, schools are overcrowded and our social services are tapped out by illegal immigrants. Not to mention the cost of incarceration of the illegals who commit further offences even after crossing the borders illegally or overstaying their visas. No matter the cost, deport ALL illegals, NO amnesty ever again, and build that fence!
2006-11-04 17:10:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"They" openly protested in American cities waving a foreign nations flag, Why would American citizens need to become an "underground" resistance force?
If it comes to resistance, then all American citizens have a constitutionally guaranteed right to form citizen militias. Look into it. We need not hide in the sewers, This is OUR country! Lets act like it! Stand and be counted!
2006-11-05 05:23:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by RENEGADE. 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Before you dress up like Paul Revere and ride forth, be sure to put your thoughts and feelings on the issue on paper(or, get all 21st century, and send email, it's quicker), and express them to your state representative and your city council. If our legislators realize they are facing a politely determined majority that would like to see resolution and results instead of perpetual debate and
indecision, they'll likely move more rapidly towards resolution on this issue. Then again, this is Congress we're talking about, the opposite of Progress hahahahahahaaha, anyway, bad jokes aside, be sure to write em and express your views. A few choice words can spur these guys n gals into action, maybe, so you don't have you use your own...
2006-11-04 18:04:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No as this sends the incorrect message. Others would anticipate, contained in the destiny, that once issues were given too undesirable yet another amnesty will be granted. economic migrants as I favor to call them come the following because they desire a more effective perfect existence for themselves and their households. i have actual considered a singular theory that would help the priority. at present they could stay in this u . s . a . for years till now they are detected or perhaps as they are they are typically held in Immigration Centres, back for years even as their case is going by the charm procedure. particularly of this expensive technique why not help them to go on skills classes or perhaps college to furnish them a way of not in basic terms helping themselves of their abode u . s . a . yet to toughen that u . s . a .. human beings come the following out of desire, they must be helped, they ought to easily accept desire and then they could go back to their own countries understanding they have something to make a contribution. this would in all likelihood be more cost-efficient than the equipment it really is in position now and we'd want to be exporting not deporting those who might want to be nurses, social workers, environmentalists, surely each and every thing you are able to imagine a arising u . s . a . needs.
2016-11-28 19:13:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You may want to know, there was an amnesty program in the 80s where illegal aliens who could prove he/she has been living here illegally for 5 years (I think) got their green card given to them. There also was a "lottery" program in the 80s where people who were here legally could just apply for the green card with no qualifications.
USA is a lawful and democratic country. If you don't like the policy, do your civic duty and do it the legal way. Forming or joining an underground group and illegally removing illegals won't solve anything. You are just causing yet another problem to the country.
2006-11-04 16:27:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by tkquestion 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I would never join a Resistance group. Aren't those like KKK? Nope, sorry, not me. I'm thankful the Native Americans didn't do that and kick my ancestors out of here. Come to think of it, with your logic wouldn't it be ok for the Natives to still do that to us? Maybe they have a Resistance Group forming to do that very thing. How are you going to feel if they come to your house in the middle of the night and put you on a boat back to Europe? That would be ok with you, right?
2006-11-04 16:20:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Sworn to defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic! Hopefully there would be enough kick-back that it wouldn't have to be underground.
Good job Minute Men!
2006-11-04 16:36:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by AngryPatriot 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not likely, the economy depends on more people that work and pay taxes. The bad news is that California is getting crowded, they should move to other central states. That's just what i think though.
2006-11-04 16:21:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by GMC 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes I would for several reasons.
1-we don't owe tham anything, not free food, health care,education, or employment.
2- they are showing more and more they do not wish to be americans but to change america and our language
3- they do not want us in their country
4-I don't care foir their parades claiming to see justice and freedom waving the flags of their country, while downing or burning ours
5-I have enough sense ot know that giving 13 million citizenship now will only open the door for another 15 millin sseekoing ght same.
6-a muslim i s about to be the first elected muslim in america because they united stastes government allowed him to bring in from somolia over 150,000 muslims and give them citizenship. most of these are people who offer the country nothing and demand everything. Their only contrbution is ot enlarge out federal budget.
2006-11-04 16:21:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Immigrants should not be allowed here, if they were not allowd here 9/11 would of never happened and we would not be in Iraq now.
Bush needs to get it threw his hea dhe is not president of the world and needs to worry about the US and the US only not all these other moron countries that use woman for slaves and kill each other. It is not his problem it is thier presidents problem.
2006-11-04 16:19:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by Diamonds_Glow 4
·
4⤊
3⤋