Police Officers, although sworn to uphold the law, are allowed a relaxation of certain laws for PRACTICAL PURPOSES. Examples of these are, but not limited to:
No use of seatbelt while on duty: It is actually a DANGER to the P.O. to be belted in while driving, because in the event he had to exit the vehicle, the lapbelt could become entangled in his own equipment.
Cell phone use: Many times, H.Q. will contact a P.O. to give information that they do not necessarily want to broadcast over the radio. Criminals have police scanners, too, you know.
Speeding: Sometimes, a P.O. may be seen going in excess of the legal limit, but, is he on "official business" ? Most times, he is.
2006-11-04 15:28:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Len_NJ 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
If you call me to come to your house for some type of domestic problem, do you want me to obey every single traffic law on the way over there? I'll be you would want me to get there as fast as I could. It's not breaking the law.
When an officer gets involved in an accident while on duty, they usually get suspended (without pay) even if it isn't their fault, so safe driving is encouraged, and usually practiced.
Also, many times the officer speeding by you is the second responder to a call and only the first one is allowed to go with lights and sirens. This is so that the other officers responding can monitor what is going on (it can be hard to hear with that siren going) on their radios. So they drive there as fast as they can in order to keep the first responding officers from going into a potentially deadly situation alone.
And most police departments require their officers to wear their seat belts on duty. It is difficult to do, when the seat belt latch covers your holster, so that you don't have ready access to your weapon, and you have to take your full sized manodnoc (night stick) off your belt as well, or you will be really uncomfortable. Many officers prefer to just leave the belt off, and keep all of their equipment on.
If a police officer breaks the law, does something off-duty like burglary, or assault or possesses narcotics, they get in more trouble than a regular citizen would because they know the law and are held to a higher standard of behavior. They can lose their job, and face even worse charges and/or stiffer sentences than a citizen who commits the same crime.
Finally, we call non-cops "citizens." It keep from fostering an "us against them" attitude.
2006-11-04 23:39:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
this is infrequently genuine. only look by the information articles that your fellow cop-haters submit each and all of the time, and you will see law enforcement officials getting arrested while they screw up each and all of the time. And, their punishments are consistently worse. in case you get arrested and fined, you could actually flow to artwork day after today. A cop would lose a weeks pay, or a month, or perhaps his complete job and pension. Why does not somebody tale the time to video criminals. we would have much less crime and extra convictions if all of you loons have been so preoccupied with video taping law enforcement officials. so which you will overlook approximately and the different "retards" yet you're bl;owing smoke out your a$$ and don't understand what you're conversing approximately. like all of the different cop hating goofballs obtainable, you would be the 1st to whine and cry if somebody did something to you, and the law enforcement officials did no longer come on your help. I additionally ask your self how properly you goofs might do in case you had precise submit with those assholes day in an day trip. What might you do in case you have been in those circumstances. i assume you would be like some saint, and pray that they no longer curse you out or spit on you. No, you will possibly have no the place close to as lots restraint as maximum law enforcement officials have. law enforcement officials don't get the penlties...this is such bullshit. They unfastened jobs for doing stuff that doesn't additionally count on your business enterprise (rapid meals, i think). And for mr. DERANGE, i'm a tax payer, and that i prefer they might kick the snot out the "occupiers" they're lazy stable for no longer something bums that don't rep[resent the actual working guy int his usa. they only piss in our parks, clog our site visitors so we are previous due for artwork and cry approximately what they % the governement to furnish them for unfastened.
2016-10-21 07:03:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cops are people too, they speed occationaly, forget their seatbelts. Every Police Department has policies pertaining to these issues. The problem is who is going to pull over a cop? The only thing that will happen is the PD will get a complaint that an officer is speeding or doing something else illegal. After a few complaints, the officer will get in trouble with the boss. Cops are not higher than the law, but who else will keep our streets clean?
2006-11-04 17:23:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by me_laub 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Due to the nature of Police work sometimes it in necessary for an Officer to exceed the speed limit when answering calls. As for the seat belt issue, in Louisiana there is a section in the seat belt statute pertaining to Police Officers exempting them from having to wear a seat belt due to the nature of the job. Have you ever tried jumping out of a vehicle to chase down a suspect and have your seat belt pull you back into the car when it caught on you duty belt?
2006-11-05 00:43:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Liam 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Different agencies have different rules. Usually for instance, lets say your neighbor calls and said they hear screaming and crying coming from your home. They are going to speed to get there, but not use lights and sirens. 2nd scenario, your neighbor calls and said they heard a gunshot go off at your house, lights, sirens and speeding now are all justifiable. And yes, they do get in trouble for speeding by their superiors, when was the last time you got a speeding ticket and had to take 3 to 5 days off without pay ?
2006-11-04 17:28:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by bugged 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
They can speed because there is no one to stop them.
In most areas they would be exempt from the seat belt law.
I can't relate for every state, but most have exemptions for vechiles that do frequent stops, such as mail and UPS delivery
( they are exempt in many states)
And while there is a disagreement even amount officers, old school teachings was that a seat belt can get in your way of drawing your weapon in an emergancy while sitting in the car.
Many departments had rules for years that officers were not suppose to wear them. This has been changing over the last few years. but officers taught the old way are hard to get them to change their ways, since they beleive it puts them at risk
2006-11-04 16:17:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I heard from a police officer that there are only certain things a officer can use his siren for so if a man is beating his wife and the cop can't use the siren would you want him to go fast?
2006-11-04 17:26:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's a benefit of upholding the law..serving and protecting....Speeding in order to catch someone is acceptable..but speeding to catch the best lunch special is not. I feel that buckling up is a choice that saves lives..but I don't feel it is anyones responsibility but the buckler..at least if the buckler is an adult.
2006-11-04 15:40:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by 35 YEARS OF INTUITION 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I would love to know this answer. I got pulled over for speeding (I deserved it), but the next day I saw a cop going a lot faster then I had been at the same spot! He didn't have his lights or siren on so it wasn't an emergency.
It makes me so mad! Hypocrites!
2006-11-04 15:31:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by leslie b 2
·
0⤊
3⤋