In this case, I think he honestly just could not stand the hypocrisy.
2006-11-04 12:49:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Isis 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Sure. Everybody has an agenda. The thing is, this guy doesn't stand to get a big payoff -- just a few headlines and a lotta pointed fingers -- therefore he would have no reason to come forward except that he feels strongly about it.
Of course, strong feelings are not a guarantee of truth; so I'm still watching the news, because this story could go in any one of a number of directions.
2006-11-04 21:01:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah, he is "OUT", that is for sure!
Finally, the truth has come OUT, despite all of his lying and denial. There is no way he can carry on the charade, he has been fired. He was quite the hypocrite talking about the gay prostitute's lie detector test. Well, let the Reverend take a lie detector test AND a drug test !!
2006-11-04 20:53:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by LaRue 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The guy is being honest when he was telling the truth. The New Life Church is going to be history if someone doesn't take over real fast!
2006-11-04 20:51:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by LVieau 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think the evangelical guy (Haggard) may be gay, it certainly looks that way.... HOWEVER...
I think this is an incredibly sleazy last-minute attack on Haggard's cause. It is no coincidence that this "revelation" surfaced during election week. I have no respect for people who play those kinds of political games.
If the man is gay, he's gay. The timing of these allegations is what disturbs me.
2006-11-04 20:51:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lanani 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't know. But the whole thing is horribly sad. What was he doing buying drugs from this guy, even if he didn't actually use them.
2006-11-04 20:49:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by holly_c3 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think he just wanted the truth to be known.
2006-11-04 20:51:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Truth, Justice, and the American way
2006-11-04 20:49:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bob from Mars 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
The spin begins, eh? heh heh....
2006-11-04 20:49:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He says he's out to expose hypocrisy. I see no evidence to doubt him, because that is exactly what he's done.
2006-11-04 21:03:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Angry Gay Man 3
·
0⤊
3⤋