2006-11-04 07:14:54 · 8 answers · asked by x1_sygnus 1 in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
Once again, there are many good arts but no best art. It's not the art, it's the artist.
2006-11-04 12:41:34 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 15⤊ 0⤋
I studied and enjoyed Ninjutsu and found it useful as a police officer and bouncer in a large live music club.
But in modern competition it has been proven out that a mixed style offering both striking and advanced grappling is the way to go.
2006-11-04 15:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Akido / You Use The Atrackers Own Weight Againest Him Self.
2006-11-04 17:06:51 · answer #3 · answered by David 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
CQC (NOT KRAV MAGA!) that WWI british military was taught.
Why? because they cover pretty much everything from bare hand combat to how to use knife, gun, bayonet, and stick to how to counter weapons, and more.
Downside is they doesn't train as much or long. However if someone choose to train them for years then those person are extremely dangerous.
2006-11-04 15:44:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
theres only one bloke that answered before me that knows anything about martial arts the rest wouldn't know **** from clay
Why? it would be quite obviuos wouldnt it.
2006-11-05 19:12:06 · answer #5 · answered by BUSHIDO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
jiu-jitsu, takes the longest to master, and is very effective.
2006-11-04 18:06:43 · answer #6 · answered by Joe B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
schools that teach mma
most bjj schools
2006-11-06 18:40:55 · answer #7 · answered by enrique r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say Jujitsu
2006-11-04 15:51:18 · answer #8 · answered by Naomi w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋