Every President since Carter that I know of has been supporting globalization and basically the end of the USA to have a North American union. I just got to wonder if this were planned between the american president and mexican president to promote that agenda.What better way to erode Americas middle income group ?Im not supporting it I just wanted to see if anyone else thought this might be the case.
2006-11-04
06:33:32
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Youknowwho
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
It's seems like it's all set to go.The nafta super highway.the sellout of all Americam manufacturing to thirdworld countries.There are even plans already for a North American euro to replace the dollar.You cant tell me it's all a coincidence.Somebody has to plan all this up and it wasnt me.
2006-11-04
06:44:52 ·
update #1
>Rob ,I believe its planned to keep up with the european union (for one reason) because once they get eveything together they will reduce us to a third world country due to their economic power.Mexico would supply the cheap labor and their ecomomy will rise to a higher standard of living while ours goes down.It will also make less of a backlash from American citizens when we become poor due to the loss of jobs ,etc
2006-11-04
07:16:57 ·
update #2
who knows, the government pulls some pretty rough crap on us all the time
2006-11-04 06:35:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by gallow 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
I think that the USA and Mexico should band together and make one big honking country out of the land mass. We could even let the Canadiens join up North if they'd agree to give up the speedos and the thongs they wear when they're around Hollywood, FL. (And that's the men). Have you ever seen some of the beaches in Mexico? On top of that, the next foreign border going South is about 1/100th the size of the border between Mexico and the USA. How much easirer would that be to fence off? The only losers would be the Coyote's who smuggle people across the border. Heck, the most corrupt part of the Mexican Government is no worse than the Democratic stronghold of Chicago.
2006-11-04 06:48:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
good day, I got here close to to calling somebody racist while he blamed the full subprime loan problem on unlawful aliens. I had to ask for forgiveness to him later. considering the fact that his job is in genuine belongings, he confirmed me the listings in my section for economic organization-owned properties and the tax documents confirmed that each and each of those I regarded at have been properties foreclosed on those with hispanic surnames. He informed me he exams hundreds of itemizing in a month interior the process doing his job--he's considered one center jap surname as a prior proprietor, and something have been hispanic surnames. He has on no account considered a economic organization-owned abode that replaced into foreclosed on somebody with a eu call, so it incredibly is not any longer white and black people inflicting this problem. If we will not close the border, permit's connect something of the international, and bypass a regulation that persons who are not the two voters or everlasting citizens can no longer purchase land right here. Sorry I have been given sidetracked. it ought to help if black people spoke out on the problem, yet extra effective than that i think of we ought to stop listening to rhetoric from the two sides, seem on the info, and are available up with an answer. Neither occasion has it genuine--the two are distracted with the deportation/amnesty situation, while controlling new immigration could desire to be the 1st priority.
2016-10-21 06:28:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ssh! theyre listening! Seriously people, the border patrol, i.n.s. are executive branch operations answerable exclusively to the president and the administration, and sisnce Pres. Bush has been in office, the arrests of illegals and the fines on businesses that UNDERemploy them has dropped to ZERO. (no I'm not a lib making all this crap up- go to boortz.com and search the site, the figures are there) but although the dems arrest and fine, they try to legislate an open border, so YES ITS A DAMN CONSPIRACY (ugly word, but it fits) it's simply that the 2 (ha ha 2 parties, thats rich!) parties take different routes (as always) to create the same problem (thats a higelian dialectic, children- and those who cannot think in those terms are doomed to financial slavery-)
and being that it is as it always will be, just semantics, on the road to the destruction of the sovereignty of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA ;
Any one possesed of reasonable faculty and cognitive ability must invariably and inevitably conclude, given the overwhelming preponderance of evidence available for open perusal on the web (if you're not TOO LAZY to go find it) that it
IS IN FACT A CONSPIRACY.
2006-11-04 06:47:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Erode? Where did you learn economics, from the back of a cereal box? Free-trade will help BOTH countries (US-MEX) financially- income, jobs and well-being by standard of living, GREATLY!!! Social Security issues are creeping up on us-so the US is looking also for a better way to mesh fluidly, an economic cooperation between the two countrties you speak of....it's all about mutual prosperity brother. If Mexicans didn't want to be here/or we didn't want you here-it wouldn't be happening.....but spreading wealth takes time. Remember, mesh fluidly. Let me ask you a question: If you had a personal goal of doing 100 pushups daily, how would you go about reaching this goal, and why? Conspiracy connotates wrong-doing. I am for the everybody eats program, what program are you for?
2006-11-04 07:16:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by For sure 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
That's been brought up before...are we being deliberately combined with canada and mexico, or will we retain our borders and national identity separate from them in the 21st century?
NAFTA was kind of a good idea, when it started out, or seemed to be, but there's a difference between free trade and gross negligence....
2006-11-04 10:51:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think to a point you are right, but I don't think they are hiding their agenda verry well. Companies pay politicians , and companies want cheap labor from illegals. Politicians allow illegals in the U.S. so they can get more money, that is all it amounts to.
2006-11-04 07:49:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by clone_marshal_bacara 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
What's in it for Mexico in this supposed conspiracy? And how does eroding the middle class benefit America or an American president?
2006-11-04 06:52:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rob B 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Rich people love slave labor,
When more Mexicans enter the USA it encourages fear, and therefore Republican voting. That is why the door is left open.
2006-11-04 06:41:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You Decide
http://www.limitstogrowth.org/WEB-text/aztlan.html
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050323-1107-us-canada-mexico.html
While left-wing socialists and anti-war Bush-bashers
are indeed helping coordinate the open borders movement,
it is a foolish, patronizing mistake
to characterize the reconquistadores
as hapless pawns of the American Left.
The homegrown multiculti-mau-mau-ers
know exactly what they believe,
and they know exactly what they are doing.
They aim to mainstream the "Stolen Land" mantra
and pervert history.
They aim to obliterate America's borders
by sheer demographic and political force.
And they are succeeding.
2006-11-04 06:40:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋