They will, but it will sound ridiculous to anyone who knows anything about science.
2006-11-04 05:15:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Proof of Creation from a non-Biblical fact: In this modern, scientific world, is it reasonable to believe in creation? There are several but this a just a few:
Physicist H. S. Lipson said: “The only acceptable explanation is creation. I know that this is anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do not like if the experimental evidence supports it.” (Italics added.)—Physics Bulletin, 1980, Vol. 31, p. 138.
“The natural laws of the universe are so precise that we have no difficulty building a spaceship to fly to the moon and can time the flight with the precision of a fraction of a second. These laws must have been set by somebody.” —Quoted from Wernher von Braun, who had much to do with sending American astronauts to the moon.
Astronomer Robert Jastrow says: “To their chagrin [scientists] have no clear-cut answer, because chemists have never succeeded in reproducing nature’s experiments on the creation of life out of nonliving matter. Scientists do not know how that happened.”—The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe (New York, 1981), p. 19.
Physical universe: If you found a precision timepiece, would you conclude that it was formed by a chance blowing together of some dust particles? Obviously, someone with intelligence made it. There is an even more magnificent “clock.” The planets in our solar system, also the stars in the entire universe, move at a rate that is more precise than most clocks designed and manufactured by man. The galaxy in which our solar system is located includes over 100 billion stars, and astronomers estimate that there are 100 billion of such galaxies in the universe. If a clock is evidence of intelligent design, how much more so is the far more vast and complicated universe!
The fantastically small atom, with its revolving electrons, is a marvel of order. Our solar system, the sun with its orbiting planets and their moons, reflects an impressive order and harmony. The DNA molecule, long and threadlike, and located in the nucleus of a cell, is like a computer, issuing instructions for all cell activities. Humans and animals breathe in oxygen and give off carbon dioxide; plants take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen—a marvelous balance.
Planet Earth: When crossing a barren desert, if you came to a beautiful house, well equipped in every way and stocked with food, would you believe that it got there by some chance explosion? No; you would realize that someone with considerable wisdom built it. Well, scientists have not yet found life on any of the planets of our solar system except the earth; available evidence indicates that the others are barren. This planet is, as the book The Earth says, “the wonder of the universe, a unique sphere.” (New York, 1963, Arthur Beiser, p. 10)
It is at just the right distance from the sun for human life, and it moves at just the right speed to be held in orbit. The atmosphere, of a kind found only around the earth, is made up of just the right proportion of gases to sustain life. Marvelously, light from the sun, carbon dioxide from the air, and water and minerals from fertile soil combine to produce food for earth’s inhabitants. Did it all come about as a result of some uncontrolled explosion in space? Science News admits: “It seems as if such particular and precise conditions could hardly have arisen at random.” (August 24 and 31, 1974, p. 124)
2006-11-04 13:30:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by jvitne 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sure...
The alternative to creation is big bang and evolution.
So, my issue is this. The nonphysical can never come from the physical - science proves this. Do you get it yet? Ok, let me break it down.
You are a thinking, rationalizing, loving, empathtic creature. Where does that come from? Science has proven the brain is like a computer - it instructs the body and is a tool. But, somewhere comes love, empathy, justice, feelings, etc.
These are nonphysical traits. They cannot be created by the physical. You have a ghost inside you - a spirit that is not physical and is not winding down with time (science also proves all physical things end).
The big bang could never create love, justice, empathy, etc. They are created and also not created by our simple brains.
2006-11-04 13:20:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike A 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is a lot of evidence.
For example, even evolutionists say for a new life form to evolve is very, very very rare. So how did asexual life forms evolve into sexual life forms? For this to happen, this rare event in evolution has to happen, not just once, but TWICE at the same time, in the same place. A male and a female must be formed. They must both be healthy enough to reproduce AND they must be compatable with each other. This just happining by itself, by accident, and being sucessful is hard to believe. This idea takes more blind faith than believing in a creator. This makes evolution hard to believe especially since nothing even close to this has ever been observed.
2006-11-04 13:36:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by JoeBama 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Bible . Period. Either you believe it or you do not. If not, that's on you.God said no proof would be given. No sign. You take it on faith, or you don't.You people make me sick. You ask a question, and then you say don't quote the Bible! The Bible is where a Christian gets his truth from! Are you so foolish as to say to a scientist don't look at any data or at your notes? No. Only bashing Christians is considered to be OK in this politically correct world of ours, huh?
2006-11-04 13:20:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Darryl L 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why does everyone believe that you either have to believe in creationalism or nothing or in science or nothing. You can have faith in the fact that God created the universe, and that science is coming to understand exactly HOW God created the universe. For all man knows, a footstep in the path of God is a million years in the path of men. The Bible wasn't faxed down from Heaven, it was written by men, for men.
2006-11-04 13:30:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mom of Marley 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. No real proof for creationism. Then again, all the proof for the big bang comes from scientific text rather than religious text. So the real question becomes, which text speaks with more authority & reason?
2006-11-04 13:18:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rance D 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
are you alive, is the sky blue, are trees growing okay there's your proof. Also for you ppl who believe in evolution-they say the world is created by a big bang, adams or whatever so what created that atom? If you can believe that an atom just appeared and made the world, why is it so hard to believe in god?
2006-11-04 13:37:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Annie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you REALLY want proof,please be patient and read the following.I will keep it as short as possible,but I must be thorough in my explanations.
When was the universe created? Some scientists say its origin occurred via a big bang from 5 to 50 billion years ago.How are these dates arrived at? One time calendar is called radiometric dating,which is the dating of rocks.In certain rocks the element uranium 238 decays into lead 206 with a half-life of 4.5 billion years(that is,the decay involves 50 % of the original uranium each 4.5 billion years). It is claimed,therefore,that the age of a rock may be determined through this method. However,there are serious problems at times with radiometric dating.For example,radiometric dating has shown certain rocks from volcanoes in Russia to be 5 billion years old,whereas it is known they were formed within the last 200 years.
There is mounting evidence that the earth may be younger than supposed,perhaps less than 12,000 years old. Here are some reasons to believe this:
1. POPULATION STATISTICS-If man appeared over 1 million years ago,the present world population wpuld be thousands of times greater than it actually is.In fact,our entire galaxy could not provide the needed space for so many.The present world population is approximately 6 billion.Assuming the average lifespan to be 70 years and the average generation length to be 35 years,then starting with one family,the present world population would result in about 30 doublings.these doublings would carry us back in history from today to around 3500 B.C. This date is suggested to mark the time of the Flood.
2. THE AMOUNT OF HELIUM-4 IN THE ATMOSPHERE- This suggests that our atmosphere is less than 15,000 years old.
3. THE ABSENCE OF METEORITE DUST- Some 15 million tons of nickel meteorite dust settle to earth each year. If the earth has indeed existed for 5 billion years,then there should now be a layer of this dust at least 200 feet thick all over the planet.Of course,no such layer is found.
4. THE DECAY OF EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD- This filed,it has been shown,has a half-life of 14400 years.This means it is weakened by 50%each 14 centuries.It also means the magnetic field was twice as strong 1400 years ago as it is now,4 times as strong 2800 years ago,and so on.Only 7000 years ago it must have been 32 times as strong.It is very doubtful that it could have been much stronger than this.
5. THE IMBALANCE OF CARBON-14 AND CARBON 12- It can be shown that it would take a period of 30,000 years to attain an equilibrium between these 2.However,at present C-14 still exceeds C-12 by some 50 percent.
6. ANOTHER TIME CALENDAR IS KNOWN AS RADIOCARBON METHOD- This method is used only in determining the age of organic fossils.Radioactive carbon is formed in the earth's upper atmosphere resulting from the incoming cosmic radiation and atmospheric nitrogen-14.It then unites with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and is absorbed by all plants and animals.At the moment of death,plants and animals cease to absorb C-14.It then begins to decay back into nitrogen 14.This has a half-life of 5730 tears.5 "half-lives" of C-14 would equal 29,000 years,and would leave only 1/32 of the original C-14 content.Therefore,the C-14 method becomes increasingly weak past a few thousand years.As with other dating methods,C-14 has its problems.Many living systems are not in equilibrium for the C-14 exchange.It has been found that the shells of living mollusks may show radiocarbon ages up to 2300 years.
There is so much scientific proof that it would take too much space to write it. Every supposed fact to support evolution can be refuted by scientifically proven evidence if you would only open your eyes and mind to it.
2006-11-04 14:41:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Big Bang...Who lit the fuse...even in the realm of science we should be asking ourselves who wrote the rules of this game of life...Creation? Watch the world in its perfection...the stars and the cosmos...this is all the proof...We are not the result of a blind watch maker...we are the result of intelligence...an dare I say...love.
2006-11-04 13:25:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by silverback487 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just look out of your window, look at your own body. How in your wildest dreams can you imagine or contemplate giving any credence whatsoever to the theory that it was all formed by a series of chance happenings or by some natural order / selection. It is just too ludicrous and fanciful to conceive and yet people do, incredible beyond belief!
2006-11-04 13:25:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by movedby 5
·
1⤊
1⤋