Does it suck that there is so much evidence for evolution and none for creation that the world as a whole looks at you as hicks that do not understand simple genetics? If creation is true how come there is no evidence for it? Is it God's way of testing us?
2006-11-04 05:00:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
An average 75% of industrilized nations believe in evolution. America is on the low end with only 40% but yes most of the world does believe in evolution so people who believe in creation is the minority.
2006-11-04 05:03:31 · update #1
there isnt any evidence mentioned in creationism. that is what really gets me every time
2006-11-04 05:03:12 · answer #1 · answered by Red Eye 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most scientist believe in some form of inteligent design because the odds of the intricacies and diversitry of life by randon happenstance are so huge as to make it impossible.
Creation does not rule out design changes through time. Infact there are references to species that are now extinct. The fact evolution is still a theory with major gaps and holes and creation relies on faith and personal experience with the Creator makes creation more believable since once a person experiences God and recognizes the experience as such they have a first hand account and no longer depend on what another tells them.
2006-11-04 05:11:31 · answer #2 · answered by mike g 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Micro evolution is a science. The other 4 types of evolution are just theories.
Scientific proof of evolution? What about -
Human and dinosaur footprints in the same rock?
The theory that things take a long time to fossilize but there are fossilized hats, boots and other man made things that took only a few years?
Evolution says it took millions of years to make the Grand Canyon; How come it still has steep walls (a river keeps changing course and wears away all surrounding land to form a valley)?
Where are all the missing links?
What of the man made items found inbeded in rocks and coal?
Evolution says that man and dinosaur are separated by millions of years(we only learned about them in the 1800's); but there are cave art and other designs that show man and dinosaurs together (the Bible talks about man and dinosaurs living together)?
There are many other issues also.
2006-11-04 05:27:42 · answer #3 · answered by tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You look at a painting. You believe there was a painter.
You look at a house. You believe there was a builder.
You look at the world. You believe what?
Look out the window. Creation delcares God glory! (Rom 1:18-25)
PS What evidence are you referring that one species changes into another? What evidence do you have that DNA can spontaneously generate more advanced coding? What evidence do you have that DNA mutations can result in more complex organic systems?
2006-11-04 05:12:12 · answer #4 · answered by CapLee 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
what is your definition of "hick"? perhaps, your definition is flawed by your ignornace. Making it hard to reason with a close minded individual such as your self.
Evidence, genetic or otherwise, is not absolute as of yet. ("simple" gentics are not conclusive, but rather reveal relation.) I have no doubt that evolution is a part of the creation process. Not being even plausibly open to all possibilities is terribly worrisome.
2006-11-04 05:08:10 · answer #5 · answered by Rose 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only evidence ever presented for creation is poking holes in the theory of evolution.
2006-11-04 05:04:06 · answer #6 · answered by valkyrie hero 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
DNA is essential for life to exist but DNA can only be produced by life. How, when no life existed, did DNA come into existence? Time magazine published an article about a DNA sampling of a cross section of women worldwide covering women of all major ethnic claasifications. The article, titled "Mother Eve", showed that the DNA characteristics of all women tested went back to one single woman.
2006-11-04 05:07:25 · answer #7 · answered by me 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe there is plenty of evidence for intelligent design, but that's my opinion. To each his own.
www.drdino.com
For the best scientific evidence to support creation, look at the above site.
2006-11-04 05:17:22 · answer #8 · answered by Rayjo Gifol 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no plausible evidense for evolution. everything they thougth they found turned out to be something entirely different than they originally thought. There would be billions of "missing links" found by now of species transfers. Show one plausible link and we will consider it. Also something dosn't come out of nothing.You could have paint, a canvas, brushesbut nothing is going to happen unless someone paints.
2006-11-04 05:07:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
well mayby thats a test im not sure the only thing I do have is faith that God did do it god has many ways of testing us that might be one of them
2006-11-04 05:06:14 · answer #10 · answered by martini 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋